ReviewCureus2025
Considering Long-Acting Synthetic Cannabidiol for Chronic Pain: A Narrative Review.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy, pharmacokinetics and safety of liposomal synthetic cannabidiol injected subcutaneously in dogs: a randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled, crossover clinical trial.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Trial
- Cannabinoids in Chronic Pain: Clinical Outcomes, Adverse Effects and Legal Challenges.Neurology international · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic pain is prevalent and challenging to treat. Cannabinoids, in particular cannabidiol (CBD), have been evaluated as analgesics without the issues of tolerance or dependence. Side effects tend to be mild and infrequent. These products have multiple routes of administration and composition, and some are available over the counter, allowing pain patients to self-medicate. Most self-medicated CBD are plant-derived extracts administered as either oils, pills, or by inhalation. During the early 1960s, CBD was chemically synthesized for the first time, but it was not yet approved for medical use; synthetic CBD has been and continues to be studied in clinical trials for numerous indications, including chronic pain, neuropathic pain, and pain in cancer. However, studies are often small, populations heterogeneous, and some results are equivocal. Research is lively, with over 60 studies reported on ClinicalTrials.gov. Multimodal CBD therapy may hold promise, particularly in combination with palmitoylethanolamide. Greater patient education and training for physicians and other healthcare providers are needed along with more comprehensive studies. Considering the problem of chronic pain, further intensive study of synthetic CBD for pain control is warranted to meet this unmet clinical need. This is particularly important in the context of long-lasting administration methods that enable easy dosing and support long-term use for patients dealing with persistent and often debilitating symptoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.