ArticlePhenomics (Cham, Switzerland)2025
Topology of gut Microbiota Network and Guild-Based Analysis in Chinese Adults.
Article in Phenomics (Cham, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exercise reshapes gut microbiota function to enhance cancer therapy.Translational oncology · 2026Review
- Sex-Specific Aging Patterns of Gut Microbiota in Urban Chinese Adults: Guild-Based Analysis and Implications for Healthy Aging.Aging cell · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gut microbiota with co-abundant behaviors is considered belonging to the same guild in micro-ecosystem. In this study, we established co-abundance networks of operational taxonomic units (OTUs) among 2944 Chinese adults from the Shanghai Men's and Women's Health Studies and observed a positive connection-dominated scale-free network using Sparse Correlations for Compositional data (SparCC). The closeness centrality was negatively correlated with other degree-based topological metrics in the network, indicating the isolated modularization of the bacteria. A total of 130 guilds were constructed, with a high modularity of 0.68, and retaining more diversity of OTUs than genus classification. The scores of guild structure similarity for comparisons between all, the healthy and the unhealthy subjects were higher than those derived from randomized permutations, suggesting a robust guild structure. We further used the constructed 130 guilds as the aggregation units to identify gut microbiota that may be associated with type 2 diabetes, and found that the OTUs in 21 significant guilds relevant to diabetes belonged to 19 of 41 (46.3%) previously reported genera (derived from Disbiome database), while only 10 (24.4%) showed different abundances between diabetes patients and healthy subjects in genus-based analysis. Our study reveals modularization of gut microbiota as guilds in Chinese populations, and demonstrates advantages of guild-based analysis in identifying diabetes-related gut bacteria. The analytical method based on microbial networks should be widely used to deepen our understanding of the role of gut microbiota in human health. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43657-024-00211-8.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.