Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40313675›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in pediatrics2025

Research advancements in the Use of artificial intelligence for prenatal diagnosis of neural tube defects.

Maryam Yeganegi, Mahsa Danaei, Sepideh Azizi, Fatemeh Jayervand, Reza Bahrami, Seyed Alireza Dastgheib, Heewa Rashnavadi, Ali Masoudi, Amirmasoud Shiri, Kazem Aghili and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT): A Paradigm Shift in Prenatal Care.International journal of preventive medicine · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Maryam YeganegiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Iranshahr University of Medical Sciences, Iranshahr, Iran.
Mahsa DanaeiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Sepideh AziziShahid Akbarabadi Clinical Research Development Unit, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Fatemeh JayervandDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Reza BahramiNeonatal Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Seyed Alireza DastgheibDepartment of Medical Genetics, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Heewa RashnavadiSchool of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Ali MasoudiSchool of Medicine, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.
Amirmasoud ShiriSchool of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Kazem AghiliDepartment of Radiology, School of Medicine, Shahid Rahnamoun Hospital, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.
Mahood NoorishadkamMother and Newborn Health Research Center, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.
Hossein NeamatzadehMother and Newborn Health Research Center, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence is revolutionizing prenatal diagnostics by enhancing the accuracy and efficiency of procedures. This review explores AI and machine learning (ML) in the early detection, prediction, and assessment of neural tube defects (NTDs) through prenatal ultrasound imaging. Recent studies highlight the effectiveness of AI techniques, such as convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and support vector machines (SVMs), achieving detection accuracy rates of up to 95% across various datasets, including fetal ultrasound images, genetic data, and maternal health records. SVM models have demonstrated 71.50% accuracy on training datasets and 68.57% on testing datasets for NTD classification, while advanced deep learning (DL) methods report patient-level prediction accuracy of 94.5% and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 99.3%. AI integration with genomic analysis has identified key biomarkers associated with NTDs, such as Growth Associated Protein 43 (GAP43) and Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein (GFAP), with logistic regression models achieving 86.67% accuracy. Current AI-assisted ultrasound technologies have improved diagnostic accuracy, yielding sensitivity and specificity rates of 88.9% and 98.0%, respectively, compared to traditional methods with 81.5% sensitivity and 92.2% specificity. AI systems have also streamlined workflows, reducing median scan times from 19.7 min to 11.4 min, allowing sonographers to prioritize critical patient care. Advancements in DL algorithms, including Oct-U-Net and PAICS, have achieved recall and precision rates of 0.93 and 0.96, respectively, in identifying fetal abnormalities. Moreover, AI's evolving role in genetic research supports personalized NTD prevention strategies and enhances public awareness through AI-generated health messages. In conclusion, the integration of AI in prenatal diagnostics significantly improves the detection and assessment of NTDs, leading to greater accuracy and efficiency in ultrasound imaging. As AI continues to advance, it has the potential to further enhance personalized healthcare strategies and raise public awareness about NTDs, ultimately contributing to better maternal and fetal outcomes.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencemachine learningneural tube defectsprenatal diagnosticsultrasound imaging

Identifiers

PMID40313675
PMCPMC12043698

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.