ReviewFrontiers in pediatrics2025
Research advancements in the Use of artificial intelligence for prenatal diagnosis of neural tube defects.
Review in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI-enabled obstetric point-of-care ultrasound as an emerging technology in low- and middle-income countries: provider and health system perspectives.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- A Hybrid Artificial Intelligence Approach for Down Syndrome Risk Prediction in First Trimester Screening.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence-driven framework for improving prenatal screening for congenital heart disease in rural Nebraska.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
- Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT): A Paradigm Shift in Prenatal Care.International journal of preventive medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence is revolutionizing prenatal diagnostics by enhancing the accuracy and efficiency of procedures. This review explores AI and machine learning (ML) in the early detection, prediction, and assessment of neural tube defects (NTDs) through prenatal ultrasound imaging. Recent studies highlight the effectiveness of AI techniques, such as convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and support vector machines (SVMs), achieving detection accuracy rates of up to 95% across various datasets, including fetal ultrasound images, genetic data, and maternal health records. SVM models have demonstrated 71.50% accuracy on training datasets and 68.57% on testing datasets for NTD classification, while advanced deep learning (DL) methods report patient-level prediction accuracy of 94.5% and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 99.3%. AI integration with genomic analysis has identified key biomarkers associated with NTDs, such as Growth Associated Protein 43 (GAP43) and Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein (GFAP), with logistic regression models achieving 86.67% accuracy. Current AI-assisted ultrasound technologies have improved diagnostic accuracy, yielding sensitivity and specificity rates of 88.9% and 98.0%, respectively, compared to traditional methods with 81.5% sensitivity and 92.2% specificity. AI systems have also streamlined workflows, reducing median scan times from 19.7 min to 11.4 min, allowing sonographers to prioritize critical patient care. Advancements in DL algorithms, including Oct-U-Net and PAICS, have achieved recall and precision rates of 0.93 and 0.96, respectively, in identifying fetal abnormalities. Moreover, AI's evolving role in genetic research supports personalized NTD prevention strategies and enhances public awareness through AI-generated health messages. In conclusion, the integration of AI in prenatal diagnostics significantly improves the detection and assessment of NTDs, leading to greater accuracy and efficiency in ultrasound imaging. As AI continues to advance, it has the potential to further enhance personalized healthcare strategies and raise public awareness about NTDs, ultimately contributing to better maternal and fetal outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.