ArticleFrontiers in computational neuroscience2025
Decentralized EEG-based detection of major depressive disorder via transformer architectures and split learning.
Article in Frontiers in computational neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Subject-Wise Depression Screening from Eight-Channel Resting-State EEG Using Asymmetry-Aware Spectral Features and Connectivity Ablation.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Depression detection using deep learning and large language models from multimodalities.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Review
- Predicting Major Depressive Disorder Using Neural Networks from Spectral Measures of EEG Data.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Privacy-preserving dementia classification from EEG via hybrid-fusion EEGNetv4 and federated learning.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) remains a critical mental health concern, necessitating accurate detection. Traditional approaches to diagnosing MDD often rely on manual Electroencephalography (EEG) analysis to identify potential disorders. However, the inherent complexity of EEG signals along with the human error in interpreting these readings requires the need for more reliable, automated methods of detection. Methods: This study utilizes EEG signals to classify MDD and healthy individuals through a combination of machine learning, deep learning, and split learning approaches. State of the art machine learning models i.e., Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, and Gradient Boosting are utilized, while deep learning models such as Transformers and Autoencoders are selected for their robust feature-extraction capabilities. Traditional methods for training machine learning and deep learning models raises data privacy concerns and require significant computational resources. To address these issues, the study applies a split learning framework. In this framework, an ensemble learning technique has been utilized that combines the best performing machine and deep learning models. Results: Results demonstrate a commendable classification performance with certain ensemble methods, and a Transformer-Random Forest combination achieved 99% accuracy. In addition, to address data-sharing constraints, a split learning framework is implemented across three clients, yielding high accuracy (over 95%) while preserving privacy. The best client recorded 96.23% accuracy, underscoring the robustness of combining Transformers with Random Forest under resource-constrained conditions. Discussion: These findings demonstrate that distributed deep learning pipelines can deliver precise MDD detection from EEG data without compromising data security. Proposed framework keeps data on local nodes and only exchanges intermediate representations. This approach meets institutional privacy requirements while providing robust classification outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.