SynthesisPsychological medicine2025
Comparative efficacy and tolerability of nutraceuticals for depressive disorder: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Psychological medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Cognitive and affective effects of L-Theanine: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 31 randomized trials.Molecular psychiatry · 2026Pooled it
- Review
- Intranasal Delivery of Curcumin-Loaded Pure Drug Self-Assembled Lipid-Based Nanoparticles for Targeted Therapy of Depression.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Article
- Comparative Effectiveness of Mind-Body Exercise Modalities on Pain Intensity and Fatigue in Patients with Non-Neuropathic Cancer-Related Pain: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.Journal of pain research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNutraceuticals have been taken as an alternative and add-on treatment for depressive disorders. Direct comparisons between different nutraceuticals and between nutraceuticals and placebo or antidepressants are limited. Thus, it is unclear which nutraceuticals are the most efficacious.
methodsWe conducted a network meta-analysis to estimate the comparative efficacy and tolerability of nutraceuticals for the treatment of depressive disorder in adults. The primary outcome was the change in depressive symptoms, as measured by the standard mean difference (SMD). Secondary outcomes included response rate, remission rate, and anxiety. Tolerability was defined as all-cause discontinuation and adverse events. Frequentist random-effect NMA was conducted.
resultsHundred and ninety-two trials involving 17,437 patients and 44 nutraceuticals were eligible for inclusion. Adjunctive nutraceuticals consistently showed better efficacy than antidepressants (ADT) alone in outcomes including SMD, remission, and response. Notable combinations were Eicosapentaenoic acid + Docosahexaenoic Acid plus ADT (EPA + DHA + ADT) (SMD 1.04, 95% confidence interval 0.64-1.44), S-Adenosyl Methionine (SAMe) + ADT (0.99, 0.31-1.68), curcumin + ADT (1.03, 0.55-1.51), Zinc + ADT (1.59, 0.63-2.55), tryptophan + ADT (1.24, 0.32-2.16), and folate + ADT (0.64, 0.17-1.10). Additionally, four nutraceutical monotherapies demonstrated superior efficacy compared to ADT: EPA + DHA (0.6, 0.32-0.88), SAMe (0.52, 0.18-0.87), curcumin (0.62, -0.17 to 1.40) and saffron (0.69, 0.34-1.04). It is noted that EPA + DHA, SAMe, and curcumin showed strong performance as either monotherapies or adjuncts to ADT. Most nutraceuticals showed comparable tolerability to placebo.
conclusionsThis extensive systematic review and NMA of nutraceuticals for treating depressive disorders indicated a number of nutraceuticals that could offer benefits, either as adjuncts or monotherapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.