ReviewNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2025
Metabolomics as a tool for understanding and treating triple-negative breast cancer.
Review in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The tumor microenvironment: a dynamic ecosystem and therapeutic nexus in modern oncology.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Stage-specific biomarkers in triple-negative breast cancer: Preliminary findings from bioinformatics approaches.Cancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markersArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive and heterogeneous variant of breast cancer distinguished by a lack of targeted therapies, posing significant challenges in diagnosis and treatment. Metabolomics, the comprehensive study of small compounds in biological systems, has been identified as an instrument for revealing the metabolic underpinnings of TNBC. This review highlights recent advancements in metabolomic approaches, such as mass spectrometry and nuclear magnetic resonance, which have identified metabolic vulnerabilities, resistance mechanisms, and potential therapeutic targets. Key findings include alterations in fatty acid, amino acid, and glutathione metabolism, along with hypoxia-driven metabolic reprogramming that contributes to disease progression. The combination of metabolomics with multi-omics techniques, supported by advanced computational methods such as machine learning, offers a pathway to overcome challenges in data standardization and biological complexity. Emerging strategies, including the use of artificial intelligence and multidimensional omics approaches, are paving the way for personalized medicine by enabling the discovery of novel biomarkers and targeted therapies. Despite these advances, significant hurdles remain, including the need for robust data standardization, validation of findings in diverse patient cohorts, and seamless integration with clinical workflows. By addressing these challenges, metabolomics has the potential to revolutionize TNBC management, offering tools for early detection, precision therapy, and improved patient outcomes. This review underscores the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration to translate metabolomic insights into actionable clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40314763What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.