ArticleEuropean radiology2025
Deep learning for automatic volumetric bowel segmentation on body CT images.
Article in European radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A multicenter study of automatic segmentation-based multimodal fusion integrating radiomics, deep learning, and clinical parameters for prostate cancer detection.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo develop a deep neural network for automatic bowel segmentation and assess its applicability for estimating large bowel length (LBL) in individuals with constipation. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe utilized contrast-enhanced and non-enhanced abdominal, chest, and whole-body CT images for model development. External testing involved paired pre- and post-contrast abdominal CT images from another hospital. We developed 3D nnU-Net models to segment the gastrointestinal tract and separate it into the esophagus, stomach, small bowel, and large bowel. Segmentation accuracy was evaluated using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) based on radiologists' segmentation. We employed the network to estimate LBL in individuals having abdominal CT for health check-ups, and the height-corrected LBL was compared between groups with and without constipation.
resultsOne hundred thirty-three CT scans (88 patients; age, 63.6 ± 10.6 years; 39 men) were used for model development, and 60 for external testing (30 patients; age, 48.9 ± 15.8 years; 16 men). In the external dataset, the mean DSC for the entire gastrointestinal tract was 0.985 ± 0.008. The mean DSCs for four-part separation exceeded 0.95, outperforming TotalSegmentator, except for the esophagus (DSC, 0.807 ± 0.173). For LBL measurements, 100 CT scans from 51 patients were used (age, 67.0 ± 6.9 years; 59 scans from men; 59 with constipation). The height-corrected LBL were significantly longer in the constipation group on both per-exam (79.1 ± 12.4 vs 88.8 ± 15.8 cm/m, p = 0.001) and per-subject basis (77.6 ± 13.6 vs 86.9 ± 17.1 cm/m, p = 0.04).
conclusionOur model accurately segmented the entire gastrointestinal tract and its major compartments from CT scans and enabled the noninvasive estimation of LBL in individuals with constipation. KEY POINTS: Questions Automated bowel segmentation is a first step for algorithms, including bowel tracing and length measurement, but the complexity of the gastrointestinal tract limits its accuracy. Findings Our 3D nnU-Net model showed high performance in segmentation and four-part separation of the GI tract (DSC > 0.95), except for the esophagus. Clinical relevance Our model accurately segments the gastrointestinal tract and separates it into major compartments. Our model potentially has use in various clinical applications, including semi-automated measurement of LBL in individuals with constipation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.