Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40315420›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2025

Filter-based models of suppression in retinal ganglion cells: Comparison and generalization across species and stimuli.

Neda Shahidi, Fernando Rozenblit, Mohammad H Khani, Helene M Schreyer, Matthias Mietsch, Dario A Protti, Tim Gollisch

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Neda ShahidiDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1961-4611
Fernando RozenblitDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7916-5681
Mohammad H KhaniDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3123-7054
Helene M SchreyerDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Matthias MietschLaboratory Animal Science Unit, German Primate Center, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3520-5394
Dario A ProttiSchool of Medical Sciences (Neuroscience), The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2554-6419
Tim GollischDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3998-533X

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation)European Research Council (ERC)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The dichotomy of excitation and suppression is one of the canonical mechanisms explaining the complexity of neural activity. Computational models of the interplay of excitation and suppression in single neurons aim at investigating how this interaction affects a neuron's spiking responses and shapes the encoding of sensory stimuli. Here, we compare the performance of three filter-based stimulus-encoding models for predicting retinal ganglion cell responses recorded from axolotl, mouse, and marmoset retina to different types of temporally varying visual stimuli. Suppression in these models is implemented via subtractive or divisive interactions of stimulus filters or by a response-driven feedback module. For the majority of ganglion cells, the subtractive and divisive models perform similarly and outperform the feedback model as well as a linear-nonlinear (LN) model with no suppression. Comparison between the subtractive and the divisive model depends on cell type, species, and stimulus components, with the divisive model generalizing best across temporal stimulus frequencies and visual contrast and the subtractive model capturing in particular responses for slow temporal stimulus dynamics and for slow axolotl cells. Overall, we conclude that the divisive and subtractive models are well suited for capturing interactions of excitation and suppression in ganglion cells and perform best for different temporal regimes of these interactions.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalRetinal Ganglion CellsAction PotentialsAmbystoma mexicanumAnimalsCallithrixComputational BiologyComputer SimulationMicePhotic StimulationSpecies Specificity

Identifiers

PMID40315420
PMCPMC12091892

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.