Trial reportScientific reports2025
Brain connectomics markers for response prediction to transcranial magnetic stimulation in cocaine use disorder.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Resting-state fMRI analysis of functional connectivity and temporal dynamics differences between cocaine users and healthy controls.Neuroimage. Reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cocaine use disorder (CUD) is a worldwide health problem with limited effective treatment options. The therapeutic potential of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is gaining more attention following evidence of its role on craving reduction in CUD. However, the heterogeneity of results underscores a pressing need for biomarkers of treatment outcome. We asked whether brain connectomics together with clinical assessments can predict response to add-on rTMS therapy for CUD better than solely conventional clinical assessments. Forty-four randomly assigned CUD patients underwent the 2-week double-blind acute phase [Sham (n = 20, 2f./18m.) and Active (n = 24, 4f./20m.)], in which they received 2 daily sessions of rTMS on the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Subsequently, 19 and 14 patients continued to an open-label maintenance phase of two weekly rTMS sessions for 3 and 6 months, respectively. Pre and post treatment resting-state brain functional connectivity as well as two clinical scores of craving were measured to predict the subsequent response to rTMS therapy. Two conventional clinical scores, namely Cocaine Craving Questionnaires (CCQ) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) were used as craving level assessments. We used a priori seed-driven connectivity of Left Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex (LDLPFC) and Anterior Cingulate Cortex (ACC) together with the connectivity from a whole-brain multi-voxel pattern analysis at each time point to predict the reduction in craving after rTMS. The combination of connectivity changes and baseline craving severity improved the prediction of individual craving compared to the prediction with only the initial craving severity. The predictive model from the combination of neuromarkers could explain 45 to 97 percent of variance in craving changes assessed by two different clinical scores. We used leave-one-subject-out cross-validation to support the generalizability of our findings. Our results indicate that employing neuromarkers from resting-state functional connectivity of pre and post condition of CUD patients receiving add-on rTMS therapy increases the power of predicting craving changes and support the idea that neuromarkers may offer improvements in precision medicine approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.