ArticleDiabetologia2025
Duration and type of statin use and long-term risk of type 2 diabetes among men and women with hypercholesterolaemia: findings from three prospective cohorts.
Article in Diabetologia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Glycemic Status and Effect of Immediate Intensive Statin on Mild Ischemic Stroke: A Subgroup Analysis of the INSPIRES Trial.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2026 · on this mapTrial
- Effects of ursodeoxycholic acid on statin-induced impaired glucose tolerance: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Methodological considerations for interpreting long-term statin use and diabetes incidence. Reply to Ma C, Zeng H [letter].Diabetologia · 2025Article
- Methodological considerations for interpreting long-term statin use and diabetes incidence.Diabetologia · 2025Article
- Impact of lipid-lowering therapy on glycemic control and the risk for new-onset diabetes mellitus.Drugs in context · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aims/hypothesisFindings from RCTs and observational studies indicate a positive association between statin use and risk of type 2 diabetes. Mendelian randomisation studies provide evidence to support that the effect is causal. However, little is known about the long-term effects, and data on different types of statins remain limited.
methodsWe analysed participants with hypercholesterolaemia from the Nurses' Health Study (NHS; 30,510 participants), the Nurses' Health Study II (NHSII; 21,547 participants) and the Health Professionals Follow-Up Study (HPFS; 9934 participants) who were free of diabetes, CVD and cancer at baseline. Statin use was assessed every 2 years starting in 2000 in the NHS and the HPFS and in 1999 in the NHSII. Incident cases of type 2 diabetes were confirmed by a validated supplementary questionnaire until the end of follow-up (31 January 2023).
resultsWe documented 6762 incident type 2 diabetes cases during up to 23 years of follow-up. Compared with non-users, statin users had a significantly higher risk of type 2 diabetes after adjustment for BMI and other potential confounding variables (pooled HR 1.40; 95% CI 1.33, 1.48). Compared with non-use, durations of statin use of 1-5, 6-10, 11-15 and >15 years were associated with HRs of 1.36 (95% CI 1.27, 1.44), 1.41 (95% CI 1.31, 1.52), 1.60 (95% CI 1.44, 1.78) and 1.76 (95% CI 1.50, 2.06), respectively; significant linear trends were observed when the comparison included non-users and within statin users only (both p CONCLUSIONS/
interpretationThe positive association between statin use and type 2 diabetes was more pronounced with a longer duration of use, and the association varied across different types of statins. Adopting and maintaining a healthy lifestyle can serve as a viable approach to diabetes prevention during statin treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40316730What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.