ReviewCommunications biology2025
Cellular parameters shaping pathways of targeted protein degradation.
Review in Communications biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evolving CRBN ligands enhance the drug-like properties of protein degraders.Journal of enzyme inhibition and medicinal chemistry · 2026Review
- De Novo-Designed Bifunctional Proteins for Targeted Protein Degradation.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2026Article
- PROTAC-mediated regulation of programmed cell death: From molecular mechanisms to therapeutic breakthroughs.Innovation (Cambridge (Mass.)) · 2026Review
- Proteolysis-targeting chimera (PROTAC) in cancer: design principles and applications on "undruggable" targets.Biomarker research · 2026Review
- Computational Modeling of PROTAC Ternary Complexes as Ensembles Using SILCS-xTAC.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026Article
- Targeted protein degradation dismantles undruggable targets to reverse immune evasion and therapy resistance in cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Identification of Hub genes in melasma using integrated transcriptomic analysis.Bioinformation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In recent years the development of proteolysis-targeting chimeras (PROTACs) has enhanced the field of ubiquitin signalling through advancing therapeutic targeted protein degradation (TPD) strategies and generating tools to explore the ubiquitin landscape. However, the interplay between PROTACs and their substrates, and other components of the ubiquitin proteasome system (UPS), raises fundamental questions about cellular parameters that might influence the action of PROTACs and the amenability of a given target to PROTAC-mediated degradation. In this perspective we discuss examples of cellular parameters that have been shown to influence PROTAC sensitivity and consider others likely to be important for PROTAC-mediated target degradation but not yet routinely considered in design of novel TPD strategies: Target localisation and accessibility on the one hand, and expression patterns, localisation and activity of E3 ligases, deubiquitinases (DUBs) and wider ubiquitin machinery on the other, are critical parameters in the exploitation of PROTACs, and establishing a better understanding of these parameters will facilitate the rational design of PROTACs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.