Evidence mapPaperPMID 40316916Full record

Trial reportBMC geriatrics2025

A randomized pilot and feasibility trial of live and recorded music interventions for management of delirium symptoms in acute geriatric patients.

Jelena Golubovic, Bjørn Erik Neerland, Melanie R Simpson, Kjersti Johansson, Felicity A Baker

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC geriatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05398211 (Music Therapy as a Treatment for Delirium in Acutely Hospitalized Older Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05398211 nacompletednot on this map

Music Therapy as a Treatment for Delirium in Acutely Hospitalized Older Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorOslo University HospitalRan2022 to 2023Enrolled26ConditionsDelirium in Old Age, Delirium of Mixed Origin, Delirium Superimposed on Dementia, Delirium Confusional StateArmsPreferred Recorded Music (PRM), Preferred Live Music (PLM)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jelena GolubovicCentre for Research in Music and Health (CREMAH), Norwegian Academy of Music, Oslo, Norway. jelena.golubovic@nmh.no.
Bjørn Erik NeerlandOslo Delirium Research Group, Department of Geriatric Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Melanie R SimpsonDepartment of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Kjersti JohanssonCentre for Research in Music and Health (CREMAH), Norwegian Academy of Music, Oslo, Norway.
Felicity A BakerCentre for Research in Music and Health (CREMAH), Norwegian Academy of Music, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDelirium is an acute shift in attention and arousal, usually triggered by acute illness or surgery in older dementia patients. Prognosis is poor, and pharmacological options are limited; non-pharmacological interventions and music show promise.

methodsThis randomised pilot and feasibility trial tested feasibility, acceptability, fidelity, and safety of music interventions (MIs) for delirium patients and assessed preliminary effectiveness and suitability of the selected effect outcomes. Participants from an acute geriatric ward were randomised to Preferred Recorded Music (PRM) and Preferred Live Music (PLM), delivered for 30 min over three consecutive days. Feasibility outcomes included recruitment rate, retention, adherence, deviations, and treatment fidelity. Clinical outcomes were trajectory of delirium symptoms (arousal, attention, cognition), delirium duration, hospital stay length, and medication intake. Post-intervention and between groups changes in delirium symptoms were compared using mixed linear regression models for the repeated measurements. Mann-Whitney test and Fishers exact test were used for length of stay and medication use, respectively.

results26 participants (PLM = 14; PRM = 12), median age 87, most with hypoactive delirium were recruited at a rate of three participants per month. Retention rates for PLM and PRM were 64% and 33% respectively and adherence to PLM and PRM intervention protocols were 83% and 58%, respectively. Total adherence to the assessment protocols was 44%. PLM was delivered as intended, (treatment fidelity 93%), and PRM did not satisfy treatment fidelity (83%). All delirium symptoms except arousal improved on day 3 compared to baseline, with statistically significant improvement in attention. No conclusive pre-post or between-group differences were detected for any outcomes; confidence intervals were wide.

conclusionsFeasibility of recruitment, interventions and assessments was indicated, and greater acceptability, safety and fidelity of the PLM intervention compared with the PRM. Adoption of external assessors is warranted in future trials, to mitigate slow recruitment and low adherence. Wide confidence intervals for most measures and comparisons indicate that the possible effect of the MIs on delirium cannot be excluded. The trial was registered at Clinical Trials, ID: NCT05398211, on 31/05/2022.

Indexed as

DeliriumMusic TherapyAcute DiseaseAgedAged, 80 and overDisease ManagementFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMalePilot ProjectsTreatment OutcomeCovid-1DeliriumFeasibilityMusicMusic therapySeverity

Identifiers

PMID40316916
PMCPMC12048927

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.