Evidence mapPaperPMID 40317012Full record

SynthesisCritical care (London, England)2025

The urea-to-creatinine ratio as an emerging biomarker in critical care: a scoping review and meta-analysis.

Michelle Carmen Paulus, Max Melchers, Anouck van Es, Imre Willemijn Kehinde Kouw, Arthur Raymond Hubert van Zanten

Registry-linked trialAbstract readScoping ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Critical care (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07412366 (Urea-to-Creatinine Ratio as a Marker of Metabolic Transition in Septic Shock), which is not on this map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07412366 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Urea-to-Creatinine Ratio as a Marker of Metabolic Transition in Septic Shock: A Comparison With Indirect Calorimetry

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorHospital Sao DomingosRan2026 to 2027Enrolled40ConditionsSeptic Shock
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Michelle Carmen PaulusDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine & Research, Gelderse Vallei Hospital, Willy Brandtlaan 10, 6716 RP, Ede, The Netherlands.
Max MelchersDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine & Research, Gelderse Vallei Hospital, Willy Brandtlaan 10, 6716 RP, Ede, The Netherlands.
Anouck van EsDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine & Research, Gelderse Vallei Hospital, Willy Brandtlaan 10, 6716 RP, Ede, The Netherlands.
Imre Willemijn Kehinde KouwDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine & Research, Gelderse Vallei Hospital, Willy Brandtlaan 10, 6716 RP, Ede, The Netherlands.
Arthur Raymond Hubert van ZantenDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine & Research, Gelderse Vallei Hospital, Willy Brandtlaan 10, 6716 RP, Ede, The Netherlands. zantena@zgv.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSevere protein catabolism is a major aspect of critical illness and leads to pronounced muscle wasting and, consequently, extended intensive care unit (ICU) stay and increased mortality. The urea-to-creatinine ratio (UCR) has emerged as a promising biomarker for assessing protein catabolism in critical illness, which is currently lacking. This review aims to elucidate the role of UCR in the context of critical illness.

methodsThis scoping review adhered to the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. A comprehensive literature search was conducted on the 3rd of September 2024, across Embase, PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Cochrane Library to identify studies related to (1) critically ill adult patients and (2) reporting at least a single UCR value. A meta-analysis was conducted for ≥ 5 studies with identical outcome parameters.

resultsOut of 1,450 studies retrieved, 47 were included in this review, focusing on UCR's relation to protein catabolism and persistent critical illness (10 studies), mortality (16 studies), dietary protein interventions (2 studies), and other outcomes (19 studies), such as delirium, and neurological and cardiac adverse events. UCR is inversely correlated to muscle cross-sectional area over time and associated to length of ICU stay, emphasising its potential role in identifying patients with ongoing protein catabolism. A UCR (BUN-to-creatinine in mg/dL) of ≥ 20 (equivalent to a urea-to-creatinine in mmol/L of approximately 80) upon ICU admission, in comparison with a value < 20, was associated with a relative risk of 1.60 (95% CI 1.27-2.00) and an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.29 (95% CI 0.89-1.86) for in-hospital mortality. DISCUSSION: UCR elevations during critical illness potentially indicate muscle protein catabolism and the progression to persistent critical illness, and high levels at ICU admission could be associated with mortality. UCR increments during ICU stay may also indicate excessive exogenous dietary protein intake, overwhelming the body's ability to use it for whole-body or muscle protein synthesis. Dehydration, gastrointestinal bleeding, kidney and liver dysfunction, and renal replacement therapy may also influence UCR and are considered potential pitfalls when assessing catabolic phases of critical illness by UCR. Patient group-specific cut-off values are warranted to ensure its validity and application in clinical practice.

Indexed as

BiomarkersCreatinineUreaCritical CareCritical IllnessHumansIntensive Care UnitsBiomarkersCreatinineUreaCritical illnessIntensive care unitNutritionProtein catabolismUCRUrea-to-creatinine ratio

Identifiers

PMID40317012
PMCPMC12046807

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.