Evidence mapPaperPMID 40317447Full record

SynthesisJournal of nephrology2025

Prediction of intradialytic hypotension by machine learning: A systematic review.

Jacob Ninan, Nasrin Nikravangolsefid, Hong Hieu Truong, Mariam Charkviani, Larry J Prokop, Raghavan Murugan, Gilles Clermont, Kianoush B Kashani, Juan Pablo Domecq Garces

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of nephrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jacob NinanDepartment of Nephrology and Critical Care Medicine, MultiCare Capital Medical Center, Olympia, WA, USA. jacob.ninan@multicare.org.
Nasrin NikravangolsefidDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Hong Hieu TruongDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Mariam CharkvianiDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Larry J ProkopMayo Clinic Libraries, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Raghavan MuruganDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Gilles ClermontDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Kianoush B KashaniDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Juan Pablo Domecq GarcesDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Funding

NIDDK NIH HHS R01DK131586
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntradialytic hypotension is associated with increased morbidity, and mortality. Several machine learning (ML) algorithms have been recently developed to predict intradialytic hypotension. We systematically reviewed ML models employed to predict intradialytic hypotension, their performance, methodological integrity, and clinical applicability.

methodsWe conducted this systematic review with a pre-established protocol registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO ID: CRD42022362194). Six databases, from their inception to July 20, 2023, were comprehensively searched. Two independent investigators reviewed the articles, extracted data, and evaluated the risk of bias using the Prediction model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST).

resultsOut of 84 screened articles, 16 studies with 14,500 adult patients on hemodialysis were included in the review. Fourteen studies (87.5%) were found to have a high risk of bias. The intradialytic hypotension prevalence in the population investigated was between 1.2 and 51%. A diverse range of predictive ML tools were used to predict intradialytic hypotension, with various neural networking models being the most frequent, appearing in 13 studies (AUROC ranges: 0.684-0.978). One study performed both internal and external validation.

conclusionsResearchers have made a concerted effort to develop ML tools to predict intradialytic hypotension. Despite their significant efforts, the lack of thorough external and clinical validation, and heterogeneity among the models and settings have resulted in a substantial challenge to offering ML tools as a global intradialytic hypotension prevention and management solution. Future studies should focus on external and clinical validation of these models to enhance the chances of clinically relevant changes in clinical practices.

Indexed as

HypotensionMachine LearningRenal DialysisHumansPredictive Value of TestsRisk AssessmentArtificial IntelligenceHypotensionKidney replacement therapyMachine learning models

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.