SynthesisJournal of nephrology2025
Prediction of intradialytic hypotension by machine learning: A systematic review.
Synthesis in Journal of nephrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Importance ranking and predictive model construction of WMSDs risk factors among shift-working nurses based on multiple machine-learning algorithms.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Critical Care Nephrology: Current Applications, Emerging Techniques, and Challenges to Clinical Integration.Kidney360 · 2026Review
- Transforming nephrology through artificial intelligence: a state-of-the-art roadmap for clinical integration.Clinical kidney journal · 2026Review
- Serum syndecan-1 correlates with coronary artery calcification severity and intradialytic hypotension in elderly hemodialysis patients.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIntradialytic hypotension is associated with increased morbidity, and mortality. Several machine learning (ML) algorithms have been recently developed to predict intradialytic hypotension. We systematically reviewed ML models employed to predict intradialytic hypotension, their performance, methodological integrity, and clinical applicability.
methodsWe conducted this systematic review with a pre-established protocol registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO ID: CRD42022362194). Six databases, from their inception to July 20, 2023, were comprehensively searched. Two independent investigators reviewed the articles, extracted data, and evaluated the risk of bias using the Prediction model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST).
resultsOut of 84 screened articles, 16 studies with 14,500 adult patients on hemodialysis were included in the review. Fourteen studies (87.5%) were found to have a high risk of bias. The intradialytic hypotension prevalence in the population investigated was between 1.2 and 51%. A diverse range of predictive ML tools were used to predict intradialytic hypotension, with various neural networking models being the most frequent, appearing in 13 studies (AUROC ranges: 0.684-0.978). One study performed both internal and external validation.
conclusionsResearchers have made a concerted effort to develop ML tools to predict intradialytic hypotension. Despite their significant efforts, the lack of thorough external and clinical validation, and heterogeneity among the models and settings have resulted in a substantial challenge to offering ML tools as a global intradialytic hypotension prevention and management solution. Future studies should focus on external and clinical validation of these models to enhance the chances of clinically relevant changes in clinical practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40317447What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.