Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40318081›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of industrial medicine2025

Applying the NIOSH Worker Well-Being Framework to Migrant and Seasonal Farmworkers: Insights From the Literature.

Tessa Bonney, Dana Madigan, Vinay Espinosa-Ravi, Linda Forst

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of industrial medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tessa BonneySchool of Public Health, Division of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6650-4346
Dana MadiganSchool of Public Health, Division of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4819-3561
Vinay Espinosa-RaviSchool of Public Health, Division of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Linda ForstSchool of Public Health, Division of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4966-1929

Funding

NIOSH CDC HHS U54 OH012503The study was supported by a grant from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (CDC/NIOSH), Grant number U54OH012503.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is a growing appreciation of the importance of health and well-being and of the complex set of factors, within and outside the workplace, that interact to affect the well-being of workers. Migrant and seasonal farmworkers experience particular challenges, and measurement of factors that influence their health and well-being is important to the ethical sustainability of this critical workforce.

methodsTo examine the applicability of the NIOSH Worker Well-Being Framework to the health and well-being of farmworkers, we conducted a literature review to (1) explore the ways in which the domains, subdomains, and constructs of the framework are described in studies of farmworkers, and (2) identify additional constructs that are not described or not in alignment with the framework.

resultsFour reviewers used a thematic analysis approach to identify and summarize key areas of alignment and non-alignment of 163 included articles. We found alignment with the five framework domains and their sub-domains, though several are understudied or narrowly operationalized in studies of farmworkers. The vast majority of studies addressed contributors to poor health. We found five additional cross-cutting or unaligned themes (legal status, discrimination, exploitation, fear of retaliation, fear of deportation).

conclusionsExternal and work-related social factors are important to the well-being of the farmworker workforce. Contextual determinants of employment precarity, hazardous occupational and nonoccupational exposures, and social safety nets should be considered in comprehensive assessments of worker well-being. Other precarious and immigrant workforces may also require expansion of the NIOSH Worker Well-Being Framework.

Indexed as

FarmersOccupational HealthTransients and MigrantsAgricultureHealth StatusHumansNational Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, U.S.United StatesWorkplaceagricultural workerfarmworkerMSAWMSFWworker healthworker safetyworker well‐being

Identifiers

PMID40318081
PMCPMC12159524

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.