ArticleArchives of oral biology2025
Association between pica practice, oral health, and cariogenic microorganisms of US pregnant women: A cross-sectional study.
Article in Archives of oral biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of pica practice on oral bacteriome and mycobiome profiles among pregnant women: A comparative study.PloS one · 2026Article
- Expert consensus on the treatment of oral diseases in pregnant women and infants.International journal of oral science · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the effects of pica practices during pregnancy on oral health risks and outcomes.
designA cross-sectional study was conducted among pregnant women in New York. Demographic, medical history and oral hygiene practice data were collected using validated questionnaires. Comprehensive oral examinations included caries and periodontal status (plaque index and bleeding on probing). Clinical samples (saliva, plaque, and pica substances obtained from participants) were processed to assess the carriage of cariogenic microorganisms (Streptococcus mutans and Candida species) using culturing-dependent and -independent methods. We statistically compared oral clinical and microbial outcomes of pica and non-pica participants.
resultsAmong 20 women enrolled (8 (40 %) with pica and 12 (60 %) without pica), the mean gestational age was 25.55 ± 8.82 weeks. Candida species were detected in 25 % of pica samples (n = 2), predominantly from ice samples. The pica group exhibited poorer oral health conditions, showing more decayed-missing-filled teeth and surfaces than the non-pica counterparts (p = 0.016). Although not statistically significant, salivary carriage of C. albicans was 2.8 times higher in women with pica compared to those without (3.3 ± 5.7 × 10
conclusionsPica practices were associated with maternal oral health risks, imploring that clinicians manage pica behaviors to mitigate oral diseases during pregnancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.