ArticleScientific reports2025
A predictive framework using advanced machine learning approaches for measuring and analyzing the impact of synthetic agrochemicals on human health.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Benchmarking molecular representations and machine learning algorithms for asymmetric catalysis: a palladium-catalysed decarboxylative asymmetric allylic alkylation case study.Journal of cheminformatics · 2026Article
- Multi-omics analysis reveals the crucial role of ligustrum lucidum carbon dots in promoting vegetable sweetpotato growth and enhancing soil health.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- GNN-ML-FRL: a graph-enhanced meta-adaptive federated learning framework for scalable pest identification and ernvironmental modeling.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence improves risk stratification for breast cancer recurrence and mortality in women exposed to pesticides: a call for reassessment of stratification criteria.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- An ecological time series study of lagged associations between pesticide use and cancer incidence in Ukraine.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- DRFC: An efficient cloud-based feature reduction and clustering algorithm for agricultural product and remote-sensing imagery.PloS one · 2026Article
- Reinforcement learning based dynamic vegetation index formulation for rice crop stress detection using satellite and mobile imagery.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- ImMLPro platform for accessible machine learning and statistical analysis in digital agriculture and beyond.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A Comprehensive Environmental and Molecular Strategy for the Evaluation of Fluroxypyr and Nature-Derived Compounds.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pesticides and other synthetic agrochemicals play a critical role in emerging agricultural practices by enhancing crop productivity and protecting against pests and diseases. However, their widespread application has raised significant concerns about environmental balance and adverse human health impacts, including neurological disorders, cancers, and respiratory and metabolic effects, particularly among agricultural workers and vulnerable populations. Extensive literature has underscored the detrimental consequences of pesticides on human health. Although, the incorporation of machine learning algorithms for accurate risk evaluation and predictive modeling still underexplored, requiring novel solutions. This study investigates the impact of synthetic agrochemicals on human health using advanced machine learning techniques, leveraging multi-level feature selection, hybrid ensemble learning, SHAP, and custom loss function to improve prediction accuracy. This study presents a robust framework for assessing the health risks posed by agrochemicals, offering novel insights into risk assessment strategies. Data sourced from credible organizations, including WHO, CDC, EPA, NHANES, and USDA, underwent extensive preprocessing and analysis. Machine learning (ML) models such as Random Forest, LightGBM, and CatBoost were employed alongside feature selection methods like mutual information gain (MI) and Recursive Feature Elimination (RFE). A custom loss function is leveraged to accurately predict the mortality cases and avoid misclassifications by penalizing the false negatives. Furthermore, Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) and Genetic Algorithm (GA) used for model optimization. Results demonstrate the superiority of ensemble models, with LightGBM-PSO + CustomLoss achieving the highest performance with accuracy (98. 87%), precision (98.59%), recall (99.27%), F1 score (98.91%). Findings of this study can contribute in policy making and regulatory framework for public safety and health. Future directions will emphasize on multi-regional dataset as well as external validation and also real-world testing and integration with public health monitoring systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.