ArticleScientific reports2025
Insights into cellular and molecular mechanisms of graphene oxide nanoparticles in photothermal therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Graphene oxide derivatives have shown promise for photothermal cancer therapy due to their efficient light-to-heat conversion in the near-infrared (NIR) range. Therefore, in this study, we investigated the potential of newly synthesized pristine (nGO) and PEGylated (nGO-PEG) graphene oxide nanoparticles, for photothermal therapy of hepatocellular carcinoma (HepG2) cells. We evaluated various aspects of cellular behavior, including migration, growth, morphology, cell membranes integrity, mitochondrial dynamics, actin cytoskeleton organization, and ROS generation along with the expression of genes linked to apoptosis (CASP8, BAX), autophagy (BECN1), cell cycle arrest (CDKN1A), and metastasis (HMMR). Our findings reveal that 5 min of 808 nm NIR irradiation caused a mild temperature increase enhancing cytotoxicity, with nGO showing higher toxicity by disrupting cell morphology, reducing proliferation, and increasing ROS levels. In contrast, nGO-PEG more effectively suppressed cell motility and demonstrated improved biocompatibility. Gene expression analysis revealed upregulation of apoptosis-related genes in nGO-PEG-treated cells indicating mitochondrial damage, while nGO induced autophagy, as seen by increased BECN1 expression. The findings point to distinct therapeutic potentials: nGO as a potent cytotoxic agent inducing autophagy, and nGO-PEG as a more biocompatible nanoparticle promoting apoptosis. This dual-pathway analysis provides a basis for tailored therapeutic strategies for liver cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.