ReviewInternational ophthalmology2025
Factors affecting the refractive error after cataract surgery.
Review in International ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of a swept-source optical coherence tomograph device (MT9000) to a partial coherence interferometry-based biometer (IOLMaster 500) in a high-altitude environment.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Investigation into the influence of secondary suction within FLACS on the postoperative ocular surface and associated mechanisms.Journal of cataract and refractive surgery · 2026Article
- Effect of Shallow Anterior Chamber on Postoperative Refractive Status in Patients of Age-Related Cataract.Journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Comparing Refractive Prediction Accuracy of IOL Master 700 and Sirius Utilizing the Barrett Universal II Formula.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Modern cataract surgery has entered the era of precision refractive surgery and is no longer only about the restoration of vision, and the factors affecting the refractive error after cataract surgery are gaining increasing attention with the patients' growing expectation of postoperative visual quality. The refractive error after cataract surgery is related to the accurate measurement of ocular biological parameters, the optimization of the intraocular lens calculation formula, and the prediction of the effective lens position. Clinicians must consider multiple factors to reduce the postoperative refractive error and improve the postoperative satisfaction of cataract patients. In this work, we review factors that affect the refractive error after cataract surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40319199What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.