Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40319229›Full record

SynthesisBMC anesthesiology2025

Nonpharmacological interventions for decreasing anxiety during anesthesia induction in children: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.

Yuanyuan Li, Shanshan Peng, Xueqin Xia, Lin Yin, Limei Liao

Abstract readNetwork Meta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC anesthesiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yuanyuan Li *Department of Radiotherapy for Head and Neck Tumors, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Shanshan Peng *Department of Radiotherapy for Head and Neck Tumors, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Xueqin XiaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Lin YinDepartment of Anesthesiology, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Center, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Limei LiaoSchool of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, No. 4, Section 2, North Jianshe Road, Chengdu, Sichuan, PR China. limeiliao@uestc.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnxiety during anesthesia induction can lead to various negative outcomes and psychological burdens in children undergoing surgery. Nonpharmacological interventions are available for reducing anxiety in this context. However, due to a lack of evidence from head-to-head randomized controlled trials (RCTs), the specific effects of these methods on children with anxiety during anesthesia induction remain unclear.

objectiveThis network meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the comparative effects of all known nonpharmacological interventions for reducing anxiety in children during anesthesia induction and to rank these interventions based on their practical applicability.

designSystematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.

methodsWe searched PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science to identify articles published up to August 2024. Two reviewers independently assessed eligibility of potential studies and extracted data. Outcome measures of the meta-analysis were the anxiety levels of children during anesthesia induction, the anxiety levels of parents, and the child's compliance during anesthesia induction. A consistency model was selected to conduct a network meta-analysis to evaluate the relative effects and rank probabilities of different nonpharmacological interventions.

resultsA total of 34 RCTs with 3,040 participants and six intervention methods were included. All trials confirmed the safety of the six intervention methods, with no significant adverse events reported. The network meta-analysis showed that the Passive Distraction Intervention (PDI)-Parental Presence at Induction of Anesthesia (PPIA), Interactive Distraction Intervention (IDI)-PPIA, IDI, PDI, and PPIA interventions were associated with more substantial reductions in anxiety than usual care. However, the studied interventions showed no statistically significant differences for reducing parental anxiety. The PPIA, IDI, and IDI-PPIA interventions also improved compliance during anesthesia induction.

conclusionsOur study confirmed that some nonpharmacological interventions are effective at reducing anxiety in children and enhancing compliance during anesthesia induction. Therefore, we recommend several interventions for clinical practice, including the PDI-PPIA, IDI-PPIA, PDI, IDI, and PPIA when working with children undergoing anesthesia induction. REGISTRATION: We registered this network meta-analysis with PROSPERO (registration no. CRD42022262874). CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

AnesthesiaAnxietyBayes TheoremChildHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAnesthesia inductionAnxietyBayesian network meta-analysisChildrenNonpharmacological interventions

Identifiers

PMID40319229
PMCPMC12049003

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.