ArticleBMC gastroenterology2025
The risk factors affecting effect of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for pancreatic duct stones.
Article in BMC gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aimed to investigate the factors affecting effect of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for pancreatic duct stones. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe data of 160 patients who underwent ESWL for pancreatic duct stones in Department of Gastroenterology, First People's Hospital of Hangzhou, Westlake University School of Medicine, from July 2017 to June 2023, were retrospectively analyzed. The age and sex of the patients were recorded. All patients underwent spiral computed tomography (CT) abdominal plain scan. The placement of the pancreatic duct stent was recorded. The maximum CT value of stones was manually measured. The regions of interest (ROI) was delineated using ITK-SNAP software, and the stone volume was recorded. According to the size of residual stones after lithotripsy, 99 patients were included in the complete lithotripsy group (CL Group) and 61 patients in the incomplete lithotripsy group (ICL Group). SPSS 26.0 software was used for processing and analysis. A P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
resultsThe Sex, maximum CT value, and volume of pancreatic duct stones were statistically significant in both groups. Binary logistic regression analysis showed that female sex, maximum CT value, and volume of pancreatic duct stones were independent risk factors affecting incomplete ESWL fragmentation in pancreatic duct stones. ICL group had a higher mean number of treatments and mean number of impacts than CL group.
conclusionThe Sex, maximum CT value, and volume of stones were related to the therapeutic effect of ESWL. Female sex, maximum CT value, and volume of stones were independent risk factors affecting incomplete stone fragmentation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.