ReviewInflammopharmacology2025
Impact of NSAIDs corticosteroids DMARDs biologics and their comparisons with natural products in C-reactive proteins (CRP) linked cardiovascular disorders.
Review in Inflammopharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pharmaco-therapeutic modulation of the Glo1-Nrf2-RAGE functional network in chronic inflammation: polyphenols in the context of current anti-inflammatory therapy.Inflammopharmacology · 2026Review
- Cumulative inflammatory index and the risk of cardiometabolic multimorbidity: a prospective cohort study among middle-aged and older adults in China.Journal of health, population, and nutrition · 2026Article
- Association between the C-reactive protein-triglyceride-glucose index and coronary heart disease in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease patients: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Relationship between C-reactive protein triglyceride glucose index and cardiovascular disease risk: a cross-sectional analysis with machine learning.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Curcumin in Inflammatory Complications: Therapeutic Applications and Clinical Evidence.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An important part of the pathophysiology of atherosclerosis is the involvement of inflammatory processes, which mediate various stages of the formation of atheroma, from the first leukocyte recruitment to the final rupture of the unstable atherosclerotic plaque. Acute phase reactant C-reactive protein (CRP), which represents varying degrees of inflammation, has been identified as a separate risk factor for several cardiovascular diseases (CVD), particularly unstable coronary syndrome. We hypothesize that CRP is a direct cause of CVD in addition to being an inflammatory marker. Therefore, therapies aimed at lowering CRP should be beneficial for both primary and secondary CVD prevention. It has been demonstrated that the use of many drugs, particularly statins, alters CRP levels while also lowering cardiovascular events. The use of inflammatory biomarkers aids in the discovery of CVDs and tracks the assessment, prognosis, and administration of treatment. An acute-phase protein called C-reactive protein (CRP) is created in response to pro-inflammatory cytokines. CRP is a key modulator of atherosclerosis and a biomarker of the inflammatory response. It is also regarded as a CVD risk factor since it actively promotes the growth of atherosclerotic plaque, instability, and consequent clot. Patients with intermediate risk for cardiovascular diseases have been using the plasma concentration of hsCRP (high sensitivity CRP) as a biomarker for disease prognosis since 2010.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40319427What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.