ArticleVeterinary and comparative oncology2025
Expanding the Spectrum of Canine Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Genetic Aberrations Through Whole Genome Sequencing Analysis.
Article in Veterinary and comparative oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Expanding the Spectrum of Canine Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Genetic Aberrations Through Whole Genome Sequencing Analysis.Veterinary and comparative oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is one of the most prevalent haematological malignancies in both humans and dogs, characterised in both species by significant clinical heterogeneity and limited prognostic predictability. With the introduction of next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies in veterinary medicine over the past decade, researchers have begun to elucidate the molecular basis of canine DLBCL (cDLBCL); however, much of the clinical heterogeneity associated with this tumour remains unexplained. In this study, we performed whole genome sequencing on 10 cDLBCL cases, all treated with chemo-immunotherapy, which exhibited similar clinico-pathological features but markedly different outcomes. Cases were classified as "poor" or "good" responders based on whether their lymphoma-specific survival fell below or above the cohort's median. Protein-coding variants and copy number aberrations unique to poor or good responders revealed novel candidate genes not previously identified in cDLBCL studies, while splicing, untranslated regions, and intronic variants were detected in genes already known to be recurrently mutated. In conclusion, our investigation has broadened the spectrum of potentially pathogenic variants implicated in cDLBCL, though further studies with larger cohorts are necessary to validate these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.