ArticleBMC palliative care2025
Inhaled nebulised medications in palliative care - a survey among palliative care practitioners in Germany.
Article in BMC palliative care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Optimizing Opioid Use in Pain Management: A Comprehensive Review of Clinical Benefits, Risks, and Dependence.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn palliative care, alternative routes for drug application besides the oral and intravenous administration are frequently necessary. Up-to-date, very little is known about the familiarity, use and perceived relevance of inhalative medications for symptom control among palliative care practitioners.
methodsWe conducted an anonymous online survey among palliative care physicians throughout Germany between 09/2021 and 04/2022. The questionnaire covered participants' sociodemographics, as well as familiarity, perceived relevance and prescription practices regarding 21 nebulised drugs. Analysis was performed using methods of descriptive statistics.
results108 fully completed questionnaires were analysed. Most of the participants were employed in palliative care for 5 + years. The administration of normal saline, mucoactive drugs, bronchodilators and steroids via nebulisation was a widely known and frequently used technique among the participants, as evidenced by its regular use in clinical routine. About 50% of the participants reported to know epinephrine and tranexamic acid for anti-oedematous or haemostyptic effects, respectively. Both drugs were considered "relevant" by more than 60% of the prescribers. Only a minority of participants reported to know and use nebulised opioids, iloprost, several antibiotics, heparin, ketamine and lidocaine.
conclusionsOur survey shows that nebulised drugs are prescribed and considered relevant in palliative care. However, for several of the mentioned medications only limited data is available regarding use and effectivity. There is also uncertainty to what extent the existing data may be transferable into routine palliative care setting. Therefore, more evidence should be generated.
trial registrationNot applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.