ArticleMedical education online2025
Exploring gender differences in empathy development among medical students: a qualitative analysis of reflections on juvenile correctional school visits.
Article in Medical education online, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Exploring Gender Perspectives in Medical Education: Latent Semantic Analysis of Israeli First-Year Medical Students' Reflections.JMIR medical education · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Empathy development is a critical component of medical education, shaping future physicians' ability to provide compassionate, patient-centered care. This study investigates the reflections of male and female medical students on their experiences at a juvenile correctional school, focusing on how gender shapes their interpretations, emotional engagement, and learning outcomes. Using a qualitative analysis of reflective journals collected from 28 participants, the study employed thematic analysis to identify gender-based patterns in emotional engagement, interpretive framing, and learning outcomes. Reflexivity measures and rigorous coding processes were implemented to ensure credibility and minimize bias in data interpretation. Male students frequently adopted a practical form of empathy, characterized by task-oriented interactions and a sense of competitive camaraderie. In contrast, female students exhibited relational empathy, emphasizing emotional connections and nurturing behaviors. These findings underscore the value of integrating gender-sensitive empathy training into medical education, encouraging the development of both relational and practical approaches. By incorporating tailored reflection exercises and interactive strategies, medical education programs can better equip students to engage compassionately with diverse patient populations. This approach enriches the learning experience and fosters a more holistic understanding of patient care, ultimately leading to improved healthcare outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.