ArticleAutophagy2025
AlphaFold2 SLiM screen for LC3-LIR interactions in autophagy.
Article in Autophagy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- FAM134B Restricts African Swine Fever Virus Capsid Assembly via Reticulophagy and Its Antiviral Activity is Antagonized by the Viral Virulence-Associated Factor pMGF300-2R.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Mitophagy-mediated immune evasion: Shared strategies of pathogens.Redox biology · 2026Review
- Discovering host-viral protein interactions in autophagy: A LIR discovery pipeline for identifying LC3-interacting region motifs in highly virulent viruses.PLoS pathogens · 2026Article
- HighRes_Builder: improved access and modeling of noncanonical residues for protein structure prediction.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Non-covalent SUMO interactions with ligases and effectors: SUMO-interacting motifs and beyond.Essays in biochemistry · 2025Review
- DMXL1 promotes recruitment of V1-ATPase to lysosomes upon TRPML1 activation.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2025Article
- AlphaFold3: An Overview of Applications and Performance Insights.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Alisol A ameliorates vascular cognitive impairment via AMPK/NAMPT/SIRT1-mediated regulation of cholesterol and autophagy.Theranostics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In selective macroautophagy/autophagy, cargo recruitment is mediated by MAP1LC3/LC3-interacting regions (LIRs)/Atg8-family interacting motifs (AIMs) in the cargo or cargo receptor proteins. The binding of these motifs to LC3/Atg8 proteins at the phagophore membrane is often modulated by post-translational modifications, especially phosphorylation. As a challenge for computational LIR predictions, sequences may contain the short canonical (W/F/Y)XX(L/I/V) motif without being functional. Conversely, LIRs may be formed by non-canonical but functional sequence motifs. AlphaFold2 has proven to be useful for LIR predictions, even if some LIRs are missed and proteins with thousands of residues reach the limits of computational feasibility. We present a fragment-based approach to address these limitations. We find that fragment length and phosphomimetic mutations modulate the interactions predicted by AlphaFold2. Systematic fragment screening for a range of target proteins yields structural models for interactions that AlphaFold2 and AlphaFold3 fail to predict for full-length targets. We provide guidance on fragment choice, sequence tuning, LC3 isoform effects, and scoring for optimal LIR screens. Finally, we also test the transferability of this general framework to SUMO-SIM interactions, another type of protein-protein interaction involving short linear motifs (SLiMs).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.