ArticleClinical practice and epidemiology in mental health : CP & EMH2025
Impact of Pre-lockdown Hyper-energy on Mood and Rhythm Dysregulation in Older Adults During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Article in Clinical practice and epidemiology in mental health : CP & EMH, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this work is to verify whether a cohort of elderly people with hyper-energy tended to increase depressive symptoms and misaligned social and personal rhythms during the lockdown compared to a cohort of older adults without hyper-energy one year before the lockdown. Methods: The two cohorts were evaluated in April 2019 (T0) and in April 2020 (T1). Hyper-energy, cognitive performance, depressive symptoms, and social and personal rhythms were evaluated at T0 and T1. Results: In the measure of the Brief Social Rhythm Scale (BSRS) score, the differences between groups in the two observation times reach statistical significance. The sub-group with previous hyper-energy at T0 but no longer having hyper-energy at T1 increases the score by more than 5 points (a higher score indicates greater rhythm dysregulation, thus having a worse regulation of rhythms at T1), while in those individuals who didn't have hyper-energy, the score remains substantially unchanged (+0.06). However, if the increase in the score from T0 and T1 is measured, both groups with hyper-energy at T0 presented a greater mean increase compared to people who did not have hyper-energy at T1. In the total of the eleven elderly people with hyper-energy at T0, the mean increase in BSRS score was 1.05±1.19 versus 0.06±0.98 (F=9.407, P=0.003), and in people who no longer had hyper-energy at T1, it was 1.05±1.19 versus 5.50±3.83 (F=105.0, P<0.0001). In people with hyper-energy at T0, the mean increase in the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) score was 0.72±0.75 versus 0.01±0.28 (F=37.153, P<0.0001). The gain was even higher in people who no longer had hyper-energy at T1, 1.38±1.03 Conclusion: The study, despite the limitations of a small sample, seems to confirm a greater vulnerability to the lockdown situation in people with hyperactivity, even in the absence of psychopathology (i.e., part of the bipolar spectrum).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.