ReviewGlobal health & medicine2025
How to build a better clinical trial ecosystem for future infectious disease emergencies in Japan: Findings from a narrative review and stakeholder meetings.
Review in Global health & medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A scoping review of randomized controlled trials in the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic: country-level research response to COVID-19 therapeutics and vaccines.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Review
- Principal investigators' experience of COVID-19 therapeutic clinical trials in Japan: a qualitative study.BMJ open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic posed a serious challenge to national and global pandemic preparedness and response (PPR). Timely identification and development of diagnostics, therapeutics and vaccines through prompt evidence generation from clinical trials was recognized as an important health security agenda. In 2022, under the guidance of Japan Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW), a health policy research team was convened to analyze the COVID-19 related clinical trial ecosystem in the context of PPR in Japan and abroad with a focus on clinical trials for therapeutics. The research mainly composed of the following: a narrative review of relevant peer reviewed journals and grey literature, interview of global experts and stakeholders including those from the United States and the United Kingdom, and a culminating meeting in Japan with various stakeholders. Based on the outcomes of this research, the team makes the following three recommendations: (1) Strengthen the leadership group's role in infectious disease clinical trials, (2) Promote sustained coordination and collaboration among stakeholders, and (3) Apply innovative clinical trial designs and create an enabling research environment. Clinical trials, as a public health good, must be further integrated into healthcare. The team advocates for the implementation of these recommendations at the policy level to help improve the clinical trial ecosystem for future health emergencies in Japan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.