ArticleBiomedical optics express2025
Sensor-driven digital motion correction of robotically-aligned optical coherence tomography retinal volumes.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Intensity Variance-Guided Automated Robotic Optical Coherence Tomography System for Ophthalmic Applications.Journal of biophotonics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Optical coherence tomography (OCT) has revolutionized diagnostics in retinal ophthalmology. Traditional OCT requires minimal relative motion between the subject and scanner, which is difficult to achieve with handheld devices and/or non-stabilized subjects. We recently introduced robotically-aligned OCT (RAOCT) as an alternative that promises to alleviate these minimal-movement requirements by tracking the subject and compensating for their motion with dynamic hardware components in real-time. However, hardware and image processing delays lead to residual motion artifacts even after automatic alignment and motion compensation. Here, we introduce a novel sensor-driven digital motion correction approach that overcomes these shortcomings. Our method leverages synchronized sensing of both the subject's eye and the scanner hardware to continuously estimate the imaging system state during acquisition. The A-scans are then remapped using a ray-tracing model of the system at the precise moment of acquisition. We demonstrate that, in addition to motion compensation from RAOCT, our method further reduces residual artifacts by 88.3 %, 80.4 %, and 62.6 % across axial, lateral, and rotational motions, respectively. We also show our correction in human retinal OCT images where residual errors from acquisition were reduced down to 12.4 µm, 0.11°, and 0.39° for axial, lateral, and rotational motion, respectively.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.