Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40322015›Full record

ArticleBiomedical optics express2025

Air-pulse optical coherence elastography: how excitation angle affects mechanical wave propagation.

Pengfei Song, Chengjin Song, Yubao Zhang, Xiao Han, Peijun Tang, Chaitanya Duvvuri, Jingjiang Xu, Yanping Huang, Jia Qin, Lin An and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical optics express, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Phantoms for use in optical coherence elastography.Journal of biomedical optics · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Pengfei SongGuangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Joint Laboratory for Intelligent Micro-Nano Optoelectronic Technology, School of Physics and Optoelectronic Engineering, Foshan University, Foshan, Guangdong 528000, China.
Chengjin SongGuangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Joint Laboratory for Intelligent Micro-Nano Optoelectronic Technology, School of Physics and Optoelectronic Engineering, Foshan University, Foshan, Guangdong 528000, China.
Yubao ZhangKey Laboratory of Opto-Electronic Information Science and Technology of Jiangxi Province and Jiangxi Engineering Laboratory for Optoelectronics Testing Technology, Nanchang Hangkong University, Nanchang 330063, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5184-9640
Xiao HanKey Laboratory of Opto-Electronic Information Science and Technology of Jiangxi Province and Jiangxi Engineering Laboratory for Optoelectronics Testing Technology, Nanchang Hangkong University, Nanchang 330063, China.
Peijun TangSchool of Optoelectronic Science and Engineering, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510006, China.
Chaitanya DuvvuriCollege of Optometry, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77204, USA.
Jingjiang XuGuangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Joint Laboratory for Intelligent Micro-Nano Optoelectronic Technology, School of Physics and Optoelectronic Engineering, Foshan University, Foshan, Guangdong 528000, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0016-5791
Yanping HuangGuangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Joint Laboratory for Intelligent Micro-Nano Optoelectronic Technology, School of Physics and Optoelectronic Engineering, Foshan University, Foshan, Guangdong 528000, China.
Jia QinGuangdong Weiren Meditech Co., Ltd., Foshan, Guangdong 528000, China.
Lin AnGuangdong Weiren Meditech Co., Ltd., Foshan, Guangdong 528000, China.
Michael D TwaCollege of Optometry, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77204, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4544-5153
Gongpu LanGuangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Joint Laboratory for Intelligent Micro-Nano Optoelectronic Technology, School of Physics and Optoelectronic Engineering, Foshan University, Foshan, Guangdong 528000, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6928-2398

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We evaluate the effect of excitation angles on the observation and characterization of surface wave propagations used to derive tissue's mechanical properties in optical coherence tomography (OCT)-based elastography (OCE). Air-pulse stimulation was performed at the center of the sample with excitation angles ranging from oblique (e.g., 70° or 45°) to perpendicular (0°). OCT scanning was conducted radially to record

Identifiers

PMID40322015
PMCPMC12047731

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.