ArticleMiddle East journal of digestive diseases2025
Endoscopic Findings in Patients Presenting Dyspepsia: A Population-Based Study in Mashhad, North East of Iran.
Article in Middle East journal of digestive diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Retrosternal Burning and Its Endoscopic Associations: Findings from 5,561 Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopies.Iranian journal of medical sciences · 2026Article
- Age- and Risk-Based Stratification in Dyspepsia: Redefining Endoscopic Thresholds for Clinically Significant and Malignant Findings.Clinics and practice · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The present study aimed to evaluate the endoscopic findings of patients with dyspepsia in Ghaem Hospital, Mashhad, Iran. Methods: This cross-sectional study collected endoscopic findings in patients with dyspepsia, including epigastric pain or heartburn, postprandial fullness, and early satiety from Ghaem Hospital from 2019 to 2020. Results: Totally, 743 patients were studied, and 42.3% (n=314) were male. The mean age was 46 years. Among participants, 85.6% (n=636) were included in the functional dyspepsia group, and the rest were included in the organic dyspepsia group. In the organic dyspepsia group, the highest frequency was related to peptic ulcer disease, with 7.2% (n=53). Moreover, the most common complaint was epigastric pain and heartburn. No significant association was found between comorbidities ( Conclusion: Dyspepsia is not necessarily accompanied by other comorbidities. The most mentioned chief complaint was epigastric pain or heartburn. Functional dyspepsia was the most common diagnosis in patients with dyspepsia, and the peptic ulcer was the leading cause of organic dyspepsia. There was no difference in the underlying cause of dyspepsia in the sexes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.