Evidence mapPaperPMID 40322675Full record

ArticleClinical kidney journal2025

Urinary peptide signature distinguishes autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease from other causes of chronic kidney disease.

Kathrin Burgmaier, Bénédicte Buffin-Meyer, Julie Klein, Brian Becknell, Daryl McLeod, Jan Boeckhaus, Oliver Gross, Claudia Dafinger, Justyna Siwy, Stéphane Decramer and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical kidney journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Kathrin BurgmaierDepartment of Pediatrics, University Hospital Cologne and University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine, Cologne, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9787-1096
Bénédicte Buffin-MeyerInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Institut of Metabolic and Cardiovascular Disease (I2MC), Toulouse, France.
Julie KleinInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Institut of Metabolic and Cardiovascular Disease (I2MC), Toulouse, France.
Brian BecknellKidney and Urinary Tract Center, Abigail Wexner Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH USA.
Daryl McLeodKidney and Urinary Tract Center, Abigail Wexner Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH USA.
Jan BoeckhausClinic of Nephrology and Rheumatology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany.
Oliver GrossClinic of Nephrology and Rheumatology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8390-8852
Claudia DafingerDepartment of Pediatrics, University Hospital Cologne and University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine, Cologne, Germany.
Justyna SiwyMosaiques Diagnostics, Hannover, Germany.
Stéphane DecramerInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Institut of Metabolic and Cardiovascular Disease (I2MC), Toulouse, France.
Franz SchaeferDivision of Pediatric Nephrology, Center for Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Max C LiebauDepartment of Pediatrics, University Hospital Cologne and University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine, Cologne, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0494-9080
Joost P SchanstraInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Institut of Metabolic and Cardiovascular Disease (I2MC), Toulouse, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7471-372X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The diagnosis of autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease (ARPKD) can be hampered by its pronounced phenotypic variability and ARPKD-mimicking phenocopies. Here, for the first time we specifically studied the urinary peptidome of patients with ARPKD with the aim of distinguishing ARPKD from other causes of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Methods: Fifty-eight urine samples from patients with ARPKD, 662 urine samples from paediatric patients with CKD with various other CKD aetiologies and 45 samples from healthy children were included. The urinary peptidome was analysed by capillary electrophoresis/mass spectrometry. Results: A 77-peptide signature specific for ARPKD was identified. Application of this signature in a matched random validation set of 19 samples of patients with ARPKD, 23 samples from patients with other CKD and 21 samples from healthy individuals led to a sensitivity of 84.2% [95% confidence interval (CI) 60.4-96.6], a specificity of 100% (95% CI 92.0-100%) and an area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) of 0.994 (95% CI 0.93-1.00). The 77-peptide signature displayed a specificity of 76.1% (95% CI 72.4-79.5) and an AUC of 0.88 (95% CI 0.85-0.90) in 591 samples from non-matched children with various CKD aetiologies. The signature was primarily (83%) composed of collagen fragments indicating structural damage. Of the remaining peptides, five originated from proteins known to bind to calcium potentially linking the current work to defaults in calcium signalling in polycystic disease. Conclusions: We determined a urinary peptide signature that identifies paediatric patients with ARPKD with high precision among a population of children with CKD. Knowledge of the identity of the underlying peptides offers a novel starting point for discussion of possible pathophysiological processes involved in ARPKD.

Indexed as

ARPKDchronic kidney diseasepeptidomepolycystic kidney diseaseurinalysis

Identifiers

PMID40322675
PMCPMC12044329

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.