ArticleJournal of clinical medicine research2025
Evaluating Postural Sway in the Elderly Using Inertial Measurement Units: A Study on Center of Mass Measurements via Accelerometers and Gyroscopes.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development, Reliability, and Validity Assessment of a Portable 3D Camera-Based System for Quantifying Postural Sway and Balance.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A New Wearable System for Postural Balance Assessment: Comparison with EquiTest and Static Posturography in Healthy Adults.Audiology research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Assessment of center of mass (COM) changes during static stance control has practical implications in clinical settings, notably among older adults. Recently portable and wearable devices, including accelerometers and gyroscopes, have emerged as a promising alternative to traditional clinical and laboratory assessments. The objectives of the study were to evaluate COM postural sway parameters derived from accelerometer and gyroscope data during static balance tasks with varying bases of support in healthy elderly individuals, and to examine the correlation and agreement between accelerometer-based and gyroscope-based parameters in postural sway assessment. Methods: One hundred and fourteen healthy elderly individuals who had not experienced falls within the preceding 6 months and were confirmed to have no risk of falling as determined by the timed up and go test, were included in this study. They were evaluated for postural sway while standing, using the sensor securely with a belt attached to the L5 vertebra. The four-stage balance test, including standing in a double stance (SO), semi-tandem stance (STO), tandem stance (TO), and single-leg stance (SL), was employed to assess each participant's ability to maintain balance under increasingly challenging standing positions on a stable surface. Results: The study demonstrated that COM posture sway increased with a demanding position and a decreasing base of support. Spearman's rho correlation coefficients from the anteroposterior and mediolateral planes exhibited strong correlation (0.75 - 0.9). Moderate reliability was observed for both the accelerometer and gyroscope parameters in both planes (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.5 and 0.75). Conclusions: Accelerometry and gyroscopes provide objective quantification of balance that have the potential to be utilized in conjunction with clinical tests to effectively evaluate the risk of falling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.