ArticleCardiology and therapy2025
Efficacy and Safety of the Fixed-Dose Combination of Atorvastatin/Fenofibrate Versus Atorvastatin on the Lipid Profile of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Dyslipidemia.
Article in Cardiology and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It reports registered trial NCT04882293. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Confirmatory Study of the Efficacy and Safety of the Fixed-dose Combination Atorvastatin / Fenofibrate Versus Atorvastatin on the Lipid Profile of Patients With Type 2 Diabetes (T2D) and Dyslipidaemia (DLP).
Open the trial in the graphWho cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pharmacokinetic Comparison Between a Fixed-Dose Combination of Atorvastatin/Fenofibrate 20/145 mg and the Corresponding Individual Components.Clinical pharmacology in drug development · 2026Trial
- Comparison of pharmacokinetics and safety of fixed-dose versus loose combination of atorvastatin/fenofibrate 10/145 mg in healthy Korean participants.Translational and clinical pharmacology · 2026Article
- PsychoPharm aggregated risk score (PARS): a multidimensional tool to flag high-risk pharmacotherapy in psychiatric patients.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIn dyslipidemia associated with type 2 diabetes (T2DM), elevated triglycerides (TG), increased low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and decreased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels are commonly found, resulting in a high prevalence of mixed dyslipidemia among patients with T2DM. Therefore, the combination therapy of atorvastatin/fenofibrate may be useful for simplifying pharmacological regimens, enhancing adherence, and requiring fewer doses of each drug to achieve the target, which decreases the number of adverse events.
methodsWe conducted a randomized multicenter, double-blind clinical trial of patients with T2DM and mixed dyslipidemia to evaluate the magnitude of change in lipid profile with a fixed-dose combination (FDC) therapy group of atorvastatin 20 mg/fenofibrate 160 mg (G_FDC) versus atorvastatin 20 mg monotherapy group (G_M), both oral route, one tablet every 24 h. The magnitude of change in the lipid profile at 2 and 4 months was compared within each group and between groups using the analysis of variance (ANOVA) test. A p value ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
resultsA total of 76 patients were included (38 per group), with an age of 56.7 ± 10.2 years, and 56.6% were women. The values at 4 months for G_FDC vs. G_M were as follow: TG mg/dL (-144.3 vs. -64.0, p = 0.004), TG percentage change (%C) (-47.9 vs. -33.1, p = 0.007); LDL-C mg/dL (-50.5 vs. -51.7, p = 0.784), LDL-C %C (-42.5 vs. -45.6, p = 0.899). The percentage of patients who achieved the targets for triglycerides (TG) was 56.7% compared to 43.8% (p = 0.309), while for LDL-C, it was 73.3% compared to 78.1% (p = 0.660). Finally, the predictive cardiovascular risk indices (∆ of change) showed a TG/HDL index of -3.9 ± 4.6 vs. -1.5 ± 2.9 (p = 0.015) and a Tg/glucose index of -0.7 ± 0.5 vs. -0.3 ± 0.4 (p = 0.003).
conclusionThe FDC therapy of atorvastatin 20 mg/fenofibrate 160 mg achieved a greater percentage reduction in lipid profile than atorvastatin alone. No differences in adverse events were observed between the groups. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov No. NCT04882293, registration date: February 28, 2022.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.