ReviewInternational ophthalmology2025
Corneal incision contracture: literature review and report of a novel therapeutic strategy using intrastromal corneal ring segments.
Review in International ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis review summarizes key aspects of corneal incision contracture (CIC), also known as wound burn. CIC is a rare complication of phacoemulsification, which can significantly compromise surgical outcomes, leading to delayed healing, suboptimal functional results, and patient dissatisfaction.
methodsA comprehensive literature review was conducted across multiple databases, encompassing full-length studies, case series, and reports. A total of 52 studies were selected, focusing either on the etiopathogenesis and risk factors of CIC or on different treatment strategies.
resultsAlthough preventing CIC remains challenging, key risk factors include excessive ultrasound energy, the use of high-viscosity ophthalmic viscosurgical devices (OVDs), and narrower, longer incisions, particularly in shallow anterior chambers. Additionally, this review highlights therapeutic approaches for managing both the acute and chronic phases of CIC. A critical analysis of previous reports reveals a lack of consensus on management and limited attention to long-term rehabilitation, contributing to suboptimal visual outcomes in the majority of patients. Finally, we propose a novel treatment for the chronic phase of CIC: the implantation of intracorneal ring segments (ICRS), a technique not previously described. This method was successfully applied in a patient with severe CIC-induced astigmatism (> 23 diopters), achieving a plano spherical equivalent and a final visual acuity (VA) of 0.8 decimal (0.1 logMAR). This outcome surpasses those reported in previous literature.
conclusionThis study highlights the significant challenges associated with CIC and introduces a promising therapeutic strategy using ICRS implantation, potentially improving outcomes for these complex cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40323338What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.