Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40323379›Full record

ReviewBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2025

[Regulation of phage therapy medicinal products: developments, challenges and opportunities].

Miriam Fürst-Wilmes, Vanessa Respondek, Nils Lilienthal, Katrin Buss, Anja Düchting

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Miriam Fürst-WilmesFachgebiet Infektiologie, Dermatologie, Allergologie, HNO, Zulassung 3, Bundesinstitut für Arzneimittel und Medizinprodukte, Bonn, Deutschland.
Vanessa RespondekFachgebiet Infektiologie, Dermatologie, Allergologie, HNO, Zulassung 3, Bundesinstitut für Arzneimittel und Medizinprodukte, Bonn, Deutschland.
Nils LilienthalFachgebiet Infektiologie, Dermatologie, Allergologie, HNO, Zulassung 3, Bundesinstitut für Arzneimittel und Medizinprodukte, Bonn, Deutschland.
Katrin BussFachgebiet Pharmazeutische Biotechnologie, Genetische und Reproduktionstoxikologie, Zulassung 2, Bundesinstitut für Arzneimittel und Medizinprodukte, Kurt-Georg-Kiesinger-Allee 3, 53175, Bonn, Deutschland.
Anja DüchtingFachgebiet Pharmazeutische Biotechnologie, Genetische und Reproduktionstoxikologie, Zulassung 2, Bundesinstitut für Arzneimittel und Medizinprodukte, Kurt-Georg-Kiesinger-Allee 3, 53175, Bonn, Deutschland. anja.duechting@bfarm.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to their biological properties, bacteriophages represent a regulatory peculiarity and a challenge for drug approval. Adopted European guidelines on pharmaceutical quality, preclinical, and clinical development are only partially applicable to phage products. The increasing threat of infections with multi-resistant pathogens has not only given a major boost to the development of bacteriophages for the treatment of bacterial infections in recent years but has also led to major progress in the adaptation of regulatory requirements. This review article presents these recent developments and the current status of regulatory requirements for phage therapeutics.In 2024, harmonised quality criteria for phage products and active pharmaceutical ingredients have been implemented in the European Pharmacopoeia for the first time. Both the EU pharmaceutical reform and the national Medical Research Act should enable exemptional regulations taking into account the special features of phage therapeutics and allow novel regulatory pathways. Although increasing clinical data on the use of phage therapeutics have been published, the desired breakthrough in the form of proof of efficacy in randomised controlled clinical trials has not yet been achieved. However, the growing knowledge on phage preparations could be used to adjust the regulatory requirements. The next and decisive step on the path to approval of a defined phage product is the evidence-based proof of efficacy and safety in a randomised controlled clinical trial.

Indexed as

Bacterial InfectionsBacteriophagesDrug ApprovalPhage TherapyEuropean UnionGermanyHumansAntibiotic resistanceClinical trialDrugsMarketing authorisationPhage therapy

Identifiers

PMID40323379
PMCPMC12129831

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.