Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40323382›Full record

ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2025

Diagnostic and prognostic value of quantitative

Junjie Li, Yin Zhou, Liu Liu, Hua Pang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Junjie LiDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Yin ZhouDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Liu LiuDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Hua PangDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China. phua1973@163.com.

Funding

General Program for Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing No: cstc2021jcyj-msxmX0006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the diagnostic and prognostic value of quantitative MATERIALS AND

methodsThe quantitative

resultsA total of 92 patients were included, with 59 confirmed LRRC cases and 33 benign lesions. Among all parameters, maximum standardized uptake value (SUV

conclusionCLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: This study highlights the diagnostic and prognostic value of

Indexed as

Fluorodeoxyglucose F18Neoplasm Recurrence, LocalPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyRectal NeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRadiopharmaceuticalsRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityFluorodeoxyglucose F18Radiopharmaceuticals18F-FDG PET/CTDiagnosisLocally recurrent rectal cancerMetabolic parametersPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID40323382

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.