ArticleNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2025
Impact of sacubitril/valsartan on adverse clinical events in heart failure with end-stage renal disease patients-a real life nationwide investigation.
Article in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Bibliometric analysis of sacubitril/valsartan in the management of chronic kidney disease (2013-2025).Renal failure · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The research aims at identifying the risk of adverse events, including acute myocardial infarction (AMI) readmission, heart failure (HF) readmission, and cardiovascular (CV) death induced by sacubitril/valsartan in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and HF. This data came from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD). Propensity scoring (PS) matching was used. Cox proportional hazard model was applied to calculate the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for adverse events among the study groups. After propensity score matching, among HF + ESRD patients, 854 received sacubitril/valsartan, and the other 854 patients did not. Compared to patients who did not receive sacubitril/valsartan, patients with sacubitril/valsartan were more likely to suffer AMI readmission (aHR = 1.85, 95% CI = 1.42-2.41), HF readmission (aHR = 2.21, 95% CI = 1.93-2.55), and CV death (aHR = 1.65, 95% CI = 1.28-2.12) after matching. Patients who received sacubitril/valsartan for less than 75 days had a greater risk of AMI readmission (aHR = 2.83, 95% CI = 2.27-3.53), HF readmission (aHR = 5.36, 95% CI = 4.75-6.06), and CV death (aHR = 2.27, 95% CI = 1.81-2.85) than non-sacubitril/valsartan cohorts. However, when the patients received sacubitril/valsartan for ≥ 185 days, they had a trend toward a lower risk of AMI readmission (aHR = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.41-1.04), HF readmission (aHR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.68-1.03), and CV death (aHR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.55-1.24) than the non-sacubitril/valsartan cohort, although it did not reach statistical significance. This study highlights significant risks associated with sacubitril/valsartan, particularly in the short term, and the protective effect of prolonged use of sacubitril/valsartan in HF + ESRD patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40323509What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.