ReviewCancer2025
The evolving therapeutic revolution in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
Review in Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Targeting drug efflux and DNA repair enhances inotuzumab ozogamicin activity in IO-resistant B-ALL cell lines.International journal of hematology · 2026Article
- A genomic and epigenomic lens into the biology of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2026Review
- Treatment of adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia-a therapeutic revolution in the making.Blood cancer journal · 2026Article
- Results of second-line therapy in adult Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia.Cancer · 2026Article
- Results of Third-Line Therapy in Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.Clinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia · 2026Article
- From MRD To Match: the Role of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplant in Philadelphia-Negative B-ALL.Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2025Review
- A tour of leukemia progress in 2025, viewed through the MD Anderson leukemia research lens.Cancer · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The past decade has witnessed remarkable advances in deciphering the pathophysiology of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and in developing novel targeted therapies. Basic research and genomic mapping have identified new prognostic biomarkers, targets, and ALL subtypes (e.g., Philadelphia-like ALL). The ongoing therapeutic revolution in ALL is driven by the addition to the treatment arsenal of therapies that target the ABL fusions, like the BCR::ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors, as well as novel agents that target CD19 and CD22: the CD22 antibody-drug conjugate inotuzumab ozogamicin, the bispecific CD3/CD19 T-cell engager antibody blinatumomab, and CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies. These combinations have improved the long-term survival rates in B-cell ALL to 70%, and in Philadelphia chromosome-positive ALL to 80%-90%. The desired goals are to achieve cure rates comparable to those in pediatric ALL and to reduce or eliminate the need for prolonged intensive/maintenance chemotherapy and associated toxicities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.