Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40323972›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Healthcare professionals' perspectives on barriers and facilitators to implementing a warning signs intervention for older rural-dwelling medical patients at risk for hospital readmission.

Mary T Fox, Jeffrey I Butler, Adam M B Day, Evelyne Durocher, Sherry Dahlke, Mark W Skinner, Behdin Nowrouzi-Kia, Janet Yamada, Ilo-Katryn Maimets

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mary T FoxSchool of Nursing, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0572-3892
Jeffrey I ButlerSchool of Nursing, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Adam M B DayNorthern Ontario School of Medicine, Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9082-6233
Evelyne DurocherSchool of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Sherry DahlkeFaculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Mark W SkinnerTrent School of the Environment, Trent University, Peterborough, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7148-6827
Behdin Nowrouzi-KiaDepartment of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5586-4282
Janet YamadaSchool of Nursing, Toronto Metropolitan University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Ilo-Katryn MaimetsSteacie Science and Engineering Library, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPrior research has identified that older rural patients and their families view preparation for detecting and responding to worsening health after a hospital stay as their most pressing unmet need, and perceive an evidence-based warning signs intervention that prepares them to do so as highly likely to meet this need. Yet, little is known about healthcare professionals' perspectives about potential barriers and facilitators to implementing warning signs interventions, especially in rural communities.

aimThis study aimed to identify potential barriers and facilitators to healthcare professionals' provision of a warning signs intervention in rural communities. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn this qualitative descriptive study, we examined healthcare professionals' perspectives on potential barriers and facilitators to providing a warning signs intervention. A purposive, criterion-based sample of healthcare professionals, stratified by professional designation (three strata - nurses, physicians, and allied healthcare professionals) who provide health care to rural dwellers in Ontario, Canada participated in semi-structured telephone focus-group discussions or 1:1 interviews on barriers and facilitators to delivering the intervention. Data were analyzed using conventional qualitative content analysis.

resultsTwenty-seven healthcare professionals participated in focus groups and 15 in 1:1 interviews for a total of 42 healthcare professionals. Analysis by healthcare professional stratum revealed nine categories of barriers and facilitators: material resources; human resources; healthcare professional communication; healthcare professional knowledge and skill; healthcare professional buy-in; context of rural practice; patient- and family-specific characteristics; risks and liabilities; and timing of intervention delivery. Seven of these categories converged across healthcare professional strata. However, the reasons why different healthcare professional strata perceived the categories as important, and the ways in which they saw them functioning as barriers and facilitators, varied. Our findings shed light on barriers and facilitators that should be considered to ensure successful implementation of the intervention in rural communities. DISCUSSION: This study adds to the limited research on rural healthcare professionals' perspectives on barriers and facilitators to delivering a warning signs intervention.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelHealth PersonnelPatient ReadmissionRural PopulationAdultAgedFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleMiddle AgedOntarioQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID40323972
PMCPMC12052142

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.