ArticlePloS one2025
Undiagnosed hypertension and associated factors among older adults in Gedeo zone, southern Ethiopia: A mixed methods approach.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- A National Dyadic Study of Spousal Education and Hypertension Among Older Couples in the United States.Research on aging · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHypertension often goes undetected for years because its initial symptoms are usually subtle and easily overlooked. Undiagnosed hypertension is a significant contributor to the onset of cardiovascular disease, renal disease, and overall mortality. Although its prevalence increases with age, few studies have investigated the factors associated with undiagnosed hypertension in older adults. Therefore, this study aimed to identify factors influencing undiagnosed hypertension among older adults in the Gedeo zone, Southern Ethiopia.
methodsA study design incorporating a community-based cross-sectional study and qualitative inquiry as a complementary approach was carried out among 609 randomly selected older adults in the Gedeo zone from March 19 to May 20, 2023. A binary logistic regression model assessed the relationships between the outcome and explanatory variables, with statistical significance set at a p-value of < 0.05. The qualitative data were transcribed, translated into English, and analyzed using Open Code version 4.03.
resultsThe prevalence of undiagnosed hypertension among older adults was 39.24% (95% CI: 35.43%, 43.19%). The determinants that were found to have a significant relationship with undiagnosed hypertension were living in urban areas (AOR = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.34, 0.83), being able to read and write (AOR = 0.21, 95% CI: 0.11, 0.38), attending primary education and above (AOR = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.32, 0.87), not having a health seeking behavior (AOR = 2.26, 95% CI: 1.48, 3.43), being overweight or obese (AOR = 4.50, 95% CI: 2.74, 7.39), having chronic diseases (AOR = 1.72, 95% CI: 1.11, 2.66), and having a family history of hypertension (AOR = 1.90, 95% CI: 1.13, 3.21).
conclusionOur findings showed that about four out of 10 older adults in the Gedeo zone have had undiagnosed hypertension. This highlights the need for a comprehensive and precise screening program for these vulnerable population. In-depth interviews revealed that television programs and healthcare providers were major sources of information regarding hypertension and its prevention methods. Therefore, it is crucial to prioritize preventive interventions and develop appropriate programs focused on older adults. In particular, people with chronic diseases and a family history of hypertension should be taught and encouraged to undergo timely checkups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.