ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025
Systematic Identification of Caregivers of Patients Living With Dementia in the Electronic Health Record: Known Contacts and Natural Language Processing Cohort Study.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A scoping review of studies on secure messaging through patient portals: persistent challenges and potential solutions.npj health systems · 2026Article
- Identifying Patient Portal Messages from Care Partners of People with Dementia.Clinical interventions in aging · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSystemically identifying caregivers in the electronic health record (EHR) is a critical step for delivering patient-centered care, enhancing care coordination, and advancing research and population health efforts in caregiving. Despite EHRs being effective in identifying patients through standardized data fields like demographics, laboratory results, medications, and diagnoses, identifying caregivers through the EHR is challenging in the absence of specific caregiver fields.
objectiveRecognizing the complexity of identifying caregiving networks of people living with dementia, this study aims to systematically capture caregiver information by combining EHR structured fields, unstructured notes, and free text.
methodsAmong a cohort of people living with dementia aged 60 years and older from Kaiser Permanente Colorado, caregiver names were identified by combining structured patient contact fields, that is, known contacts, with name-matching and natural language processing techniques of unstructured notes and patient portal messages containing caregiver terms.
resultsAmong the cohort of 789 people living with dementia, 95% (n=749) had at least 1 caregiver name listed in structured fields (mean 2.1 SD 1.1). Over 95% of the cohort had caregiver terms mentioned near a known contact name in unstructured encounter notes, with 35% having a full name match in unstructured patient portal messages. The natural language processing model identified 7556 "new" names in the unstructured EHR text containing caregiver terms among 99% of the cohort with high accuracy and reliability (F
conclusionsPatterns in caregiver-related information were distributed across structured and unstructured EHR fields, emphasizing the importance of integrating both data sources for a comprehensive understanding of caregiving networks. A framework was developed to systematically identify potential caregivers across caregiving networks using structured and unstructured EHR data. This approach has the potential to improve health services for people living with dementia and their caregivers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.