ReviewNeuroscience and biobehavioral reviews2025
Not the same as it ever was: A review of memory modification, updating, and distortion in humans and rodents.
Review in Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sex-specific role of microglia in ΔNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026Article
- Aging disrupts transcriptional programs for memory updating in the dorsal hippocampus and reveals a required role forbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Old mice fail to integrate a memory update into an existing hippocampal engram.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- The cognitive neuroscience of memory representations.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Memory is a reconstructive and continuous process that enables existing information to be modified in response to a changing environment. Being able to dynamically update outdated memories is critical to an organism's survival. Memory modifications have been extensively studied in both rodents and humans, and prior work has revealed many regional, cellular, neurotransmitter, and subcellular molecular mechanisms underlying this process. However, these diverse bodies of literature have not yet been fully integrated into a comprehensive cross-species review. Integrating the finding across rodent and human work is important for furthering our understanding of memory modifications and the underlying neural mechanisms that support memory modification in both species. Here, we discuss advances in our understanding of adaptive and maladaptive memory modifications in terms of both underlying mechanisms (regional, cellular, and molecular) and behavioral outcomes. By emphasizing findings from both humans and rodents, the two major model systems in which memory modifications have been studied, we are able to highlight converging mechanisms and point to open questions in the field. Specifically, we discuss the major findings from several memory paradigms including declarative, aversive and procedural memory designs and highlight paradigms and models that have been readily translated between rodent and human models. Ultimately, this review identifies key parallels underlying memory updating across species, paradigms, tasks, and models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.