ArticleScientific reports2025
Metabolomic insights of cultured meat compared to conventional meat.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Critical regulatory pathways for the development of sheep myoblasts and the enhancement of cultured meat quality.Food chemistry: X · 2026Article
- Learning from All Views: A Multiview Contrastive Framework for Metabolite Annotation.Analytical chemistry · 2026Article
- Nutritional, Ethical and Ecological Aspects of Cultured Meat with Particular Emphasis on Functional Food Production: A Comprehensive Literature Review.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Cultured Meat: A Multidimensional Review of Technological, Nutritional, Ethical, and Regulatory Advances (2020-2025).Journal of food science · 2026Review
- Learning from All Views: A Multiview Contrastive Framework for Metabolite Annotation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Recent Advances in Marine-Derived Polysaccharide Hydrogels: Innovative Applications and Challenges in Emerging Food Fields.Polymers · 2025Review
- Establishment of chicken muscle and adipogenic cell cultures for cultivated meat production.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The growing global demand for sustainable food sources has accelerated the development of cultured meat as an alternative to traditional animal-based meat. Cultured meat is produced through advanced cell cultivation techniques, offering potential solutions to environmental, ethical, and food security challenges. This study aims to predict the safety of cultured meat compared to conventional chicken using a comprehensive metabolomics approach. We conducted a comparative analysis of conventional chicken meat, muscle satellite cells, and myotube formed cells. The findings reveal that while the overall metabolic profiles of cultured and conventional meats are largely comparable, significant differences exist in specific metabolites associated with nutrient metabolism. These variations suggest potential differences in the nutritional content of cultured meat, which could affect its dietary value. Despite these differences, our analysis indicates no significant impact on the safety of cultured meat, which remains within acceptable safety limits. This study contributes to the ongoing evaluation of cultured meat as a viable and safe alternative in the pursuit of sustainable food sources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.