Trial reportScientific reports2025
Iliopsoas plane block versus femoral nerve block for postoperative quality of recovery following hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of ultrasound-guided Iliopsoas Plane Block on postoperative immune function and recovery quality in elderly patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
- [Peripheral regional anesthesia and analgesia: "the magnificent seven" for training].Die Anaesthesiologie · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The iliopsoas plane block (IPB) is a novel analgesic technique that has been demonstrated to be effective for hip fracture and hip replacement surgery. This study aimed to assess the effect of IPB on postoperative quality of recovery following elective hip arthroplasty compared with femoral nerve block (FNB). One hundred patients underwent elective hip arthroplasty were randomly assigned to the IPB or FNB groups. The primary outcome was the quality of recovery 24 h after surgery. Secondary outcomes included the quality of recovery at 48 and 72 h after surgery, pain scores, quadriceps strength, first time out of bed, total opioid consumption, patient satisfaction, and complications. Compared with participants in the FNB group, Quality of recovery-15 score at 24-h was significantly higher in the IPB group (127 [123-130] vs. 117.5 [113.7-120.2]), with a median difference of 9 (95% CI, 7-11; P < 0.001). Moreover, the QoR-15 score of the IPB group was higher than that of the FNB group at 48 and 72 h after surgery (P < 0.001). However, there were no clinically significant differences between the two groups. Quadriceps strength was superior in the IPB group than that in the FNB group (P < 0.001). The first time out of bed was shorter in the IPB group than that in the FNB group (P < 0.001). This study found that IPB enhanced the quality of recovery in the first 24 h following hip arthroplasty compared with FNB.Trial registration Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2200055289.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.