ArticleThe international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity2025
Development and evaluation of the COntextualised and Personalised Physical activity and Exercise Recommendations (COPPER) Ontology.
Article in The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and evaluation of the COntextualised and Personalised Physical activity and Exercise Recommendations (COPPER) Ontology.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2025Article
- An ontological framework for organising and describing behaviours: The Human Behaviour Ontology.Wellcome open research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPersonalised recommendations for action and coping plans for physical activity (PA) may reduce user burden and increase plan quality. Ontologies are a promising alternative to existing black-box approaches for creating such personalised recommendations as they are able to integrate knowledge from domain experts, input from end-users and data. Here, we report the development of an ontology of physical activities action and coping plans relevant for primary prevention.
methodsOntology specification was carried out using literature research, requirement analysis using use case scenarios, and decision-tree workshops. Conceptualisation combined input from existing theories and classification systems, end-users, domain experts and data sets to create lists of concepts, labels, definitions, properties and relationships. Logic rules were created during ontology formalization, and the entire ontology was translated into Web Ontology Language using Protégé. The ontology was checked for logical consistency. The process was evaluated using the Open Biomedical and Biological Ontology (OBO) Repository Principles, and the resulting recommendations using competency questions and use cases.
resultsThe ontology consists of an upper-level ontology, and lower-level ontologies for personal profile, planning, activity, context, barrier, and coping strategy. The final ontology consists of 288 classes, 9 data properties and 64 object properties. Development followed OBO ontology design principles. The ontology is logically and structurally consistent, and resulting recommendations were deemed relevant based on competency questions and use cases.
conclusionsThis is the first ontology focusing on physical activity that (1) follows OBO design principles, including being openly available, (2) includes profile and context information and (3) maps knowledge regarding barriers and coping strategies. It can be used as the base of decision-support systems for action and coping planning for physical activity in primary prevention in Western-European adults, and is easily adaptable to other target groups. Challenges and opportunities of ontologies in health promotion are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.