Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40325477›Full record

ArticleRespiratory research2025

Exhaled volatile organic compounds as novel biomarkers for early detection of COPD, asthma, and PRISm: a cross-sectional study.

Jiaxin Tian, Qiurui Zhang, Minhua Peng, Leixin Guo, Qianqian Zhao, Wei Lin, Sitong Chen, Xuefei Liu, Simin Xie, Wenxin Wu and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Respiratory research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. The Evolving Landscape of COPD Typization.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Jiaxin Tian *Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 197, Rui Jin Er Rd., Shanghai, 200025, China.
Qiurui Zhang *Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 197, Rui Jin Er Rd., Shanghai, 200025, China.
Minhua Peng *ChromX Health Co., Ltd., Guangzhou, 510555, China.
Leixin Guo *Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 197, Rui Jin Er Rd., Shanghai, 200025, China.
Qianqian ZhaoDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 197, Rui Jin Er Rd., Shanghai, 200025, China.
Wei LinChromX Health Co., Ltd., Guangzhou, 510555, China.
Sitong ChenChromX Health Co., Ltd., Guangzhou, 510555, China.
Xuefei LiuDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 197, Rui Jin Er Rd., Shanghai, 200025, China.
Simin XieDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 197, Rui Jin Er Rd., Shanghai, 200025, China.
Wenxin WuDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 197, Rui Jin Er Rd., Shanghai, 200025, China.
Yijie LiDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 197, Rui Jin Er Rd., Shanghai, 200025, China.
Junqi WangChromX Health Co., Ltd., Guangzhou, 510555, China. junqi.wang@chromxhealth.com.
Jin CaoDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 197, Rui Jin Er Rd., Shanghai, 200025, China. cj20668@rjh.com.cn.
Ping WangDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 197, Rui Jin Er Rd., Shanghai, 200025, China. wp20919@rjh.com.cn.
Min ZhouDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 197, Rui Jin Er Rd., Shanghai, 200025, China. doctor_zhou_99@163.com.

Funding

Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China 2022YFC2010005National Natural Science Foundation of China 82070004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGlobally, chronic respiratory diseases have become the third leading cause of death, including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma, and have been threatening human life for a long time. To alleviate the disease burden, it is crucial to develop rapid and convenient screening methods for COPD, preserved ratio impaired spirometry (PRISm), and asthma. Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in breath can reflect the pathophysiological processes of disease, thereby having the potential to serve as a promising approach for diagnosing respiratory diseases. Can we identify VOC markers in breath with the potential to serve as classification indicators, and further establish learning models for the early detection of COPD, asthma, or PRISm patients?

methodsThis is a cross-sectional study in which exhaled breath samples were collected from 184 patients with COPD, 66 patients with asthma, 72 PRISm individuals, and 45 healthy individuals. From August 2023 to June 2024, the breath samples were analyzed using portable micro gas chromatography (CXBA-Alpha, ChromX Health Co., Ltd.). Potential VOC markers for classification were identified by univariate and multivariate analyses. Subsequently, classification models were established by machine learning algorithms, based on these VOC markers along with baseline characteristics. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of these models were calculated to assess their overall discriminatory performance.

resultsA total of 367 patients were enrolled in our study. We identified nine VOCs distinguishing COPD patients from healthy controls, nine VOCs differentiating the PRISm population from healthy controls, five VOCs separating asthma patients from healthy controls, five VOCs distinguishing COPD patients from asthma patients, and seven VOCs differentiating the PRISm population from asthma patients based on breathomics feature selection. We utilized five algorithms to establish diagnostic models and selected the optimal one among them. The random forest model best distinguished COPD from healthy controls with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.92 ± 0.01. The support vector classifier (SVC) model was most effective in separating PRISm from healthy controls, achieving an AUC of 0.78 ± 0.01. Logistic regression performed well in discriminating asthma from PRISm (AUC, 0.74 ± 0.02) and COPD (AUC, 0.92 ± 0.01), in contrast, the random forest model differentiated asthma from healthy controls with an AUC of 0.81 ± 0.02.

conclusionVOC panel-based classification models have the potential to be a novel strategy for the discrimination of chronic respiratory diseases. Using the portal micro gas chromatography enables swift detection of chronic respiratory disease and, most importantly, facilitates the rapid identification of PRISm individuals within the population.

Indexed as

AsthmaExhalationPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveSpirometryVolatile Organic CompoundsAdultAgedBiomarkersBreath TestsCross-Sectional StudiesEarly DiagnosisFemaleHumansMachine LearningMaleMiddle AgedBiomarkersVolatile Organic Compounds

Identifiers

PMID40325477
PMCPMC12051326

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.