Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40325943›Full record

ReviewClinical pharmacology and therapeutics2025

Navigating Pharmacogenomic Testing in Practice: Who to Test and When to Test.

James M Stevenson, D Max Smith, Sony Tuteja, Jai N Patel, Pharmacogenomics Global Research Network (PGRN) Publications Committee

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

James M StevensonDivision of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1640-1135
D Max SmithMedStar Health, Columbia, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3667-2936
Sony TutejaDivision of Translational Medicine and Human Genetics, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7007-3289
Jai N PatelDivision of Cancer Pharmacology & Pharmacogenomics, Atrium Health Levine Cancer, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9845-3697
Pharmacogenomics Global Research Network (PGRN) Publications Committee

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is increasing attention on the clinical utility and value of pharmacogenetic (PGx) testing to individualize medication management. Most clinical practice guidelines from medical professional societies do not recommend routine PGx testing, with a few key exceptions. Inconsistent recommendations across clinical practice guidelines, FDA product labeling, and payer reimbursement policies have hampered widespread adoption of testing. Multiple resources exist to aid in the adoption and use of actionable PGx test results in clinical practice; however, most of these resources do not provide guidance on who should receive PGx testing and when-a critical question the clinical community continues to struggle with. There are multiple considerations when answering this question beyond the clinical validity of the drug-gene interaction itself, such as the actionable result frequency, severity of the adverse clinical outcome, predictive power of the PGx test, suitability of alternative treatments, cost, and turnaround time of test results. This perspective discusses these considerations and models for testing including preemptive screening, pretreatment testing, and reactive testing, highlighting advantages and disadvantages of each approach. The authors provide their perspectives on identifying candidates for PGx testing in the current real-world environment and how that differs from a clinically ideal scenario.

Indexed as

PharmacogeneticsPharmacogenomic TestingPrecision MedicineHumansPractice Guidelines as Topic

Identifiers

PMID40325943
PMCPMC12355021

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.