Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40326083›Full record

ArticleJournal of veterinary internal medicine

Multi-Institutional Retrospective Analysis of Prognostic Scoring Systems for Dogs With Acute Pancreatitis (504 Dogs).

Harry Cridge, Daniela Cabrera, Timothy Bolton, Cameron Vaughn, Nolie Parnell, Betty Chow, Alexander Schreiber, Andrew Mackin, Paige Albers, Sichao Wang

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of veterinary internal medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Harry CridgeDepartment of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0236-2307
Daniela CabreraDepartment of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.
Timothy BoltonDepartment Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5970-6441
Cameron VaughnDepartment Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA.
Nolie ParnellDepartment Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA.
Betty ChowVCA Animal Specialty and Emergency Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7775-3719
Alexander SchreiberVCA Animal Specialty and Emergency Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Andrew MackinDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, Mississippi, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8465-0198
Paige AlbersDepartment of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.
Sichao WangCenter for Statistical Training and Consulting (CSTAT), Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.

Funding

Short-term biomedical research training program for veterinary studentsT35OD016477 · OD · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI COLLEEN Cosgrove HEGG, Andrea Noel Johnston · 2013 to 2026
$1.5M
NIH HHS T35 OD016477
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcute pancreatitis (AP) in dogs has a broad clinical presentation and variable progression, making prognostication challenging. HYPOTHESIS/

objectives(i) To compare predicted prognosis for death and for prolonged (≥ 5 days) hospitalization across scoring schemes for AP in dogs and (ii) to predict concordance of each scoring scheme with death and for prolonged hospitalization. ANIMALS: Five hundred four client-owned dogs.

methodsMulti-institutional retrospective study. Data extracted from medical records included: signalment, history, physical examination findings, diagnostic results, length of hospitalization, and death. Five prognostic schemes (OS, CSI, APPLE

resultsOverall concordance was low. Only APPLE CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: On a population level, APPLE

Indexed as

Dog DiseasesPancreatitisAcute DiseaseAnimalsDogsFemaleMalePrognosisRetrospective StudiesSeverity of Illness Indexcaninedeathgastroenterologypancreasprognosisprolonged hospitalization

Identifiers

PMID40326083
PMCPMC12053076

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.