Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40327448›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2025

Benchmarking the methods for predicting base pairs in RNA-RNA interactions.

Mei Lang, Thomas Litfin, Ke Chen, Jian Zhan, Yaoqi Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mei LangInstitute of Systems and Physical Biology, Shenzhen Bay Laboratory, Shenzhen 518107, China.ORCID 0009-0001-9277-2555
Thomas LitfinInstitute for Biomedicine and Glycomics, Griffith University, Southport, QLD 4222, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4863-3865
Ke ChenInstitute of Systems and Physical Biology, Shenzhen Bay Laboratory, Shenzhen 518107, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0433-5580
Jian ZhanInstitute of Systems and Physical Biology, Shenzhen Bay Laboratory, Shenzhen 518107, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0856-2385
Yaoqi ZhouInstitute of Systems and Physical Biology, Shenzhen Bay Laboratory, Shenzhen 518107, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9958-5699

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China # 22350710182
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationThe intricate network of RNA-RNA interactions, crucial for orchestrating essential cellular processes like transcriptional and translational regulations, has been unveiling through high-throughput techniques and computational predictions. As experimental determination of RNA-RNA interactions at the base-pair resolution remains challenging, a timely update for assessing complementary computational tools is necessary, particularly given the recent emergence of deep-learning-based methods.

resultsHere, we employed base pairs derived from three-dimensional RNA complex structures as a gold standard benchmark to assess the performance of 23 different methods ranging from alignment-based methods, free-energy-based minimization to deep-learning techniques. The result indicates that a deep-learning-based method, SPOT-RNA, can be generalized to make accurate zero-shot predictions of RNA-RNA interactions not only between previously unseen RNA structures but also between RNAs without monomeric structures. The finding underscores the potential of deep learning as a robust tool for advancing our understanding of these complex molecular interactions. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: All data and codes are available at https://github.com/meilanglang/RNA-RNA-Interaction.

Indexed as

Base PairingComputational BiologyRNABenchmarkingDeep LearningNucleic Acid ConformationRNA

Identifiers

PMID40327448
PMCPMC12141194

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.